2017
DOI: 10.2344/anpr-65-01-08
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dexmedetomidine Increases the Latency of Thermal Antinociception in Rats

Abstract: Recent reports have stated that dexmedetomidine (DEX), an α-adrenoreceptor agonist, enhances the local anesthetic effects of ropivacaine and prolongs its effective duration. However, little is known about the effect of a combination of DEX and lidocaine on anesthetic duration. Therefore, we investigated whether DEX can prolong the local anesthetic effect of lidocaine, using the thermal paw withdrawal test in Wistar rats in order to measure local anesthetic duration. We subcutaneously injected 50 μL of either n… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(6 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to measure the local anesthetic effect, the thermal nociceptive block assessment protocol reported by Tsutsui et al 10 was implemented. First, a rat was placed in a wire net container, which was placed on a heated glass base.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In order to measure the local anesthetic effect, the thermal nociceptive block assessment protocol reported by Tsutsui et al 10 was implemented. First, a rat was placed in a wire net container, which was placed on a heated glass base.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The subject sample size was calculated using G*Power software version 3.1.9.2 (E. Erdfelder, Psychologicsches Institute der Universitat Dusseldorf, Germany) with an α error probability of .05, a power of 0.8, and an effect size based on a mean difference in paw withdrawal latency of 3.0 seconds (SD 3.0 seconds) for each group. The estimate of the difference in paw withdrawal latency used for this analysis was obtained from a previous study by Tsutsui et al 10 Based on these parameters, the power analysis demonstrated that 44 rats in total or 11 rats per group were required for this study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%