2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2014.01.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Devolatilisation kinetics and pyrolytic analyses of Tectona grandis (teak)

Abstract: Devolatilisation kinetics and pyrolytic analyses were carried out on Tectona grandis (teak) using iso-conversional methods (Flynn-Wall-Ozawa and Starink) and analytical Py-GC/MS technique respectively. Proximate and elemental analyses were also performed and they showed that the ash and C contents and the HHV were 0.7%, 49.6% and 19.8MJ/kg respectively. Biomass sample was subjected to multiple heating rates (5-35K/min) in thermogravimetric experiments and kinetic parameters were evaluated from the non-isotherm… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

15
46
1
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
15
46
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The correlation coefficients obtained for the methods were fairly high, which attests to the reliability of the models [25]. Generally, the trends of the apparent activation energy for both methods and samples are fairly comparable; reaching a peak of 171.78 and 187.73 kJ mol respectively for Friedman's and Starink's.The apparent activation energy obtained for both methods were within the range reported for biomass residues [36,40]. For both BSG and extractive-free BSG, the average value of the apparent activation energy returned by Friedman's model was comparatively higher than Starink's; this is similar to an earlier observation made in literature [24].…”
Section: Tga and Kinetic Datasupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The correlation coefficients obtained for the methods were fairly high, which attests to the reliability of the models [25]. Generally, the trends of the apparent activation energy for both methods and samples are fairly comparable; reaching a peak of 171.78 and 187.73 kJ mol respectively for Friedman's and Starink's.The apparent activation energy obtained for both methods were within the range reported for biomass residues [36,40]. For both BSG and extractive-free BSG, the average value of the apparent activation energy returned by Friedman's model was comparatively higher than Starink's; this is similar to an earlier observation made in literature [24].…”
Section: Tga and Kinetic Datasupporting
confidence: 79%
“…(1), yields a temperature integral that is not amenable to an analytical solution. The temperature integral is often linearized through a couple of approximation techniques [36]. Starink [37] examined two of such techniques (Flynn-Wall-Ozawa and Kissinger-Akhira-Sunose) and optimized them to obtain the expression in Eq.…”
Section: Kinetic Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mahogany and teak lignin contents were 23.0 and 27.8% while the ash contents were 0.9 and 3.4% respectively. These values are similar to 3.8% extractives, 25.3% lignin and 0.5% ash reported for teak by Balogun et al [22].…”
Section: IIIsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…The Kissinger-AkahiraSunose (KAS) method and the Starink method were used in this study to calculate the apparent activation energy [16,17]. The expression of KAS method was based on the following Eq.…”
Section: Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%