17th International Photodynamic Association World Congress 2019
DOI: 10.1117/12.2525701
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Devices based on light emitting fabrics dedicated to PDT preclinical studies

Abstract: Whether preclinical studies either involve a cell or animalmodel, the distribution of light plays a determinant role in the reproducibility of results of photodynamic therapy (PDT) studies. Unfortunately, only few illumination devices dedicated to preclinical studies are available and are for the most, very expensive. Mostresearch teams use home-made solutions that may not always be reproducible because of undefined light distribution, additive thermal emission, or unsuitable for shapes and volumes to illumina… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…PS2 was synthesized and provided by the team of Dr. Celine Frochot (Supplementary Figure S1). In vitro and in vivo illumination was performed as previously described with a specific device developed by OncoThAI research team [16]. For in vitro study, a homogenous illumination during 1 h at 1 mW/cm 2 (3.6 J/cm 2 ) was performed and for in vivo treatment, an extracorporeal fractionated illumination of 2 h 30 in total (1 min of illumination followed by 2 min of rest, repeated 45 times) at 11 mW/cm 2 (29.7 J/cm 2 ) was performed.…”
Section: Photodynamic Therapy Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PS2 was synthesized and provided by the team of Dr. Celine Frochot (Supplementary Figure S1). In vitro and in vivo illumination was performed as previously described with a specific device developed by OncoThAI research team [16]. For in vitro study, a homogenous illumination during 1 h at 1 mW/cm 2 (3.6 J/cm 2 ) was performed and for in vivo treatment, an extracorporeal fractionated illumination of 2 h 30 in total (1 min of illumination followed by 2 min of rest, repeated 45 times) at 11 mW/cm 2 (29.7 J/cm 2 ) was performed.…”
Section: Photodynamic Therapy Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A homogeneous illumination (1 mW/cm 2 ) with a 668 nm laser was then performed for 1 h, with a specific device developed by OncoThAI. Thanks to the device, 8 × 75 cm 2 or 25 cm 2 or 96-well plates could be illuminated simultaneously and homogeneously, as previously described [22]. After another 24 h, the supernatant was recovered, centrifuged, and then frozen at −20 • C, until further use.…”
Section: Photodynamic Therapy Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was connected to CELL-LEF which gave irradiance values ranging from 0.81 to 1.18 mW cm −2 with a homogeneity of 90.9%, much below the accessible emission limits of class 1 as per IEC 60,825 standard. The study also surpassed concerns regarding elevation in temperature during treatment as an illumination of 45 min led to an increase of only + 1.14 °C while the inside of the well recorded an increase of + 0.88 °C [17,18].…”
Section: In Vitro and In Vivo Evaluation Of Light Emitting Fabricmentioning
confidence: 75%