1991
DOI: 10.1016/0029-5493(91)90028-g
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Device for testing concrete under impact tensile loading and lateral compression

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
47
0
3

Year Published

2001
2001
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
47
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Weerheijm [29] concluded that the fracture energy is strain-rate-independent since experiments showed relatively constant fracture energy up to strain rates of 23 s -1 , but more recent studies ( [30-32]) indicate that also the fracture energy is strain-rate-dependent. Schuler [30] has proposed a relation between the dynamic increase factor for the fracture energy for concrete, defined as the ratio between the dynamic fracture energy and the static fracture energy, and the crack-opening velocity, as shown in …”
Section: Plain Concretementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Weerheijm [29] concluded that the fracture energy is strain-rate-independent since experiments showed relatively constant fracture energy up to strain rates of 23 s -1 , but more recent studies ( [30-32]) indicate that also the fracture energy is strain-rate-dependent. Schuler [30] has proposed a relation between the dynamic increase factor for the fracture energy for concrete, defined as the ratio between the dynamic fracture energy and the static fracture energy, and the crack-opening velocity, as shown in …”
Section: Plain Concretementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Weerheijm [29] concluded that the fracture energy is strain-rate-independent since experiments showed relatively constant fracture energy up to strain rates of 23 s -1…”
Section: Plain Concretementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several analytical, experimental and numerical studies demonstrated that the evolution of micro-cracks cannot occur arbitrarily fast due to inertia effects [26][27][28]. Thus, if damage is used to describe microcracking , its evolution has to be retarded in case of high strain rates, i.e.…”
Section: Rate-dependent Damage Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, a modified Charpy impact test [1], as in the conventional Charpy impact machine used by the metallurgists, where a swinging pendulum is allowed to strike a specimen in its path thereby transferring momentum and causing high stress rates. Other significant impact tests include the split Hopkinson pressure bar test [2,3], in which the specimen is sandwiched between two elastic pressure bars and stress waves are generated by using a drop weight or a projectile. Two techniques mentioned above are not convenient for testing the impact resistance of reinforced concrete or concrete structures owing to the dimensions of the sample, thus, a drop weight impact test is always used to study the impact response of the concrete structures [4][5][6][7][8][9][10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%