1984
DOI: 10.1063/1.447713
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deviations from the linear mixture rule in nonequilibrium chemical kinetics

Abstract: In experimental studies of vibrational relaxation, dissociation, or isomerization of molecular gases, it is common to use mixtures of the reacting gas with inert diluents. Rate constants for the reaction in pure reactant gas or pure diluent gas are then evaluated by extrapolation using the linear mixture rule (LMR): kLMR=∑ixiki, where xi is the mole fraction of gas i and ki is the rate constant for the reaction in pure component i. However, this rule is only obeyed rigorously for first order or pseudo-first-or… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, in the case of non‐Boltzmann reactant distributions, constraints imposed on theoretical kinetics parameters by experimental data under conditions where non‐Boltzmann reactant distributions are insignificant can still be used to constrain model predictions under conditions where non‐Boltzmann reactant distributions are significant through substitution of the elementary kinetics model. Similar situations may also arise in many realistic combustion environments, where comparable concentrations of species with different collision efficiencies might require more accurate mixture rules for pressure‐dependent reactions (e.g., ).…”
Section: Consideration Of Relevant Parametric and Structural Uncertaimentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, in the case of non‐Boltzmann reactant distributions, constraints imposed on theoretical kinetics parameters by experimental data under conditions where non‐Boltzmann reactant distributions are insignificant can still be used to constrain model predictions under conditions where non‐Boltzmann reactant distributions are significant through substitution of the elementary kinetics model. Similar situations may also arise in many realistic combustion environments, where comparable concentrations of species with different collision efficiencies might require more accurate mixture rules for pressure‐dependent reactions (e.g., ).…”
Section: Consideration Of Relevant Parametric and Structural Uncertaimentioning
confidence: 85%
“…In addition to the uncertainties in the calculation of molecular properties discussed above, there are additional uncertainties that can arise in some situations from inadequacy of the employed elementary kinetics model, e.g., the breakdown of standard assumptions in cases where non‐Boltzmann reactant distributions , non‐RRKM , nonadiabatic , coupled torsions , multidimensional tunneling , weak‐collision‐in‐ J energy transfer , or nonlinear mixture rules are important. For example, in previous implementations of the multiscale informatics approach for Cl‐initiated C 3 H 8 oxidation , the structural uncertainty parameter describing uncertainty due to non‐Boltzmann reactant distributions was identified to play a key role in the interpretation of some of the experimental data (γ n‐B in Fig.…”
Section: Consideration Of Relevant Parametric and Structural Uncertaimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nonlinear behavior can be attributed to the fact that the rovibrational energy distribution of the reactant in bath gases composed of colliders with varied energy transferred per collision, E , will vary with composition. Master equation solutions by Dove et al [37] show that the rate constant in a multicomponent bath gas is always higher than that predicted by the linear mixture rule. Analytical solutions of the master equation by Troe [36] indicate that deviations are higher when components have greater differences in E values and the stronger collider is present in mole fractions of 5-10%.…”
Section: H + O 2 (+M)=ho 2 (+M) (R9)mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…While the above-mentioned mixture rules differ in terms of their description of the falloff regime, all of them assume a linear mixture rule in the low-pressure limit. However, previous theoretical studies have indicated deviations from the linear mixture rule in the low-pressure limit if one of the bath-gas components is a weak collider with an average energy transferred per collision, E , that differs from the other colliders in the mixture [36,37]. The nonlinear behavior can be attributed to the fact that the rovibrational energy distribution of the reactant in bath gases composed of colliders with varied energy transferred per collision, E , will vary with composition.…”
Section: H + O 2 (+M)=ho 2 (+M) (R9)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…29,30 Second, the classic linear mixture rule (cf. LMR,P in Table 2) always underestimates the rate constant in the mixture, 30 i.e., any nonzero deviations from the classic linear mixture rule are always positive. Third, deviations from the classic linear mixture rule are generally larger when mixture components have greater differences in their energy transfer characteristics.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%