2008
DOI: 10.14490/jjss.38.87
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developments in the Analysis of Spatial Data

Abstract: Disregarding spatial dependence can invalidate methods for analyzing crosssectional and panel data. We discuss ongoing work on developing methods that allow for, test for, or estimate, spatial dependence. Much of the stress is on nonparametric and semiparametric methods.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
(50 reference statements)
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…error terms. In case of lack of independence, Robinson (2008Robinson ( , 2011 derives consistency and asymptotic distribution theory for the local constant regression estimator in relation to various kinds of spatial data. Other authors (for example, Xiao et al, 2003;Lin and Carroll, 2000;Ruckstuhl et al, 2000;Wang, 2003) study possible extensions of the nonparametric regression to a non i.i.d.…”
Section: Nonparametric Regression With Dependent Errorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…error terms. In case of lack of independence, Robinson (2008Robinson ( , 2011 derives consistency and asymptotic distribution theory for the local constant regression estimator in relation to various kinds of spatial data. Other authors (for example, Xiao et al, 2003;Lin and Carroll, 2000;Ruckstuhl et al, 2000;Wang, 2003) study possible extensions of the nonparametric regression to a non i.i.d.…”
Section: Nonparametric Regression With Dependent Errorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Geostatistics is the result of introducing spatial dependence into statistical basics. Disregarding spatial dependence can invalidate methods for analyzing cross-sectional and panel data [7]. It was also established along with the already common statistical analysis of the variables, there must be an assessment of how well the models describe the spatial features of the data [8].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We obtain this by normalizing the weights such that each of the rows of the spatial weighting matrix sums up to 1. This normalization offers an interpretation of the weight vector in relative terms and additionally presents the advantage of enhancing dynamic stability (see Robinson 2008).…”
Section: Impulse Response Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%