2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.braindev.2017.10.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developmental trend of children with Down’s syndrome – How do sex and neonatal conditions influence their developmental patterns?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
21
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
4
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This study did not show any association of foot rotation asymmetry with gender, ethnicity, other comorbidities, physiotherapy, or occupational therapy interventions. Rihtman et al 18 did not observe any association between gender and motor integration; however, some other previous studies on DS reported that girls have better motor development, and boys who were underweight and/or presented cardiac alterations had a slower development 19 . Malak et al 20 carried out a study with DS children in which the researchers confirmed that the upstanding and gait skills were delayed even when physiotherapy was performed.…”
Section: Discussion Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…This study did not show any association of foot rotation asymmetry with gender, ethnicity, other comorbidities, physiotherapy, or occupational therapy interventions. Rihtman et al 18 did not observe any association between gender and motor integration; however, some other previous studies on DS reported that girls have better motor development, and boys who were underweight and/or presented cardiac alterations had a slower development 19 . Malak et al 20 carried out a study with DS children in which the researchers confirmed that the upstanding and gait skills were delayed even when physiotherapy was performed.…”
Section: Discussion Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…A sizable minority of infants with DS are born prematurely (Aoki et al . ), although official prematurity prevalence data are difficult to obtain. Each of these biomedical factors – congenital heart defects, significant illness and premature birth – are known to impact cognitive outcomes in the general population of infants without DS (Mahle ; Bhutta et al .…”
Section: Distal Factors: Biomedical Riskmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Approximately 44-50% of infants with DS are born with a congenital heart defect (American Academy of Pediatrics 2001; Freeman et al 2008), and many others have a history of illness (American Academy of Pediatrics 2001; Goffinski et al 2015;Martin et al 2018). A sizable minority of infants with DS are born prematurely (Aoki et al 2018), although official prematurity prevalence data are difficult to obtain. Each of these biomedical factorscongenital heart defects, significant illness and premature birthare known to impact cognitive outcomes in the general population of infants without DS (Mahle 2001;Bhutta et al 2002;Karsdorp et al 2006), but the link between these risk factors and infant cognition in DS remains unclear.…”
Section: Distal Factors: Biomedical Riskmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, we inspect the score distributions of two caregiver report measures, the Orienting/Regulation dimension of the Infant Behavior Questionnaire-Revised (IBQ-R) [34] and the Communication and Symbolic Behavior Scales Infant Toddler Checklist (CSBS-ITC) [42]. The effects of prematurity [43] and CHD [36], both biomedical risk factors associated with DS, as well as caregiver education level, are also investigated. We then characterize the predictive value of infant regulatory function for social communication performance six months later.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%