2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuro.2014.01.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developmental neurotoxicity of ortho-phthalate diesters: Review of human and experimental evidence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
114
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 144 publications
(119 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
5
114
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the light of multiple testing issues and in the absence of consistency of results across ages and within phthalate metabolites, we consider it likely that the few statistically significant associations observed may be due to chance and they should therefore be interpreted with caution. Despite inconsistencies between studies and the few associations obtained in the present work, several mechanisms have been described to explain the potential health effects of phthalates on the developing brain, including hormonal disruption (thyroid hormones), alteration of the calcium signaling and the lipid metabolism and the activation of peroxisome proliferatoractivated receptors (PPAR) (Boas et al, 2012;Miodovnik et al, 2014). Several factors could explain our findings and those of previous studies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 45%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In the light of multiple testing issues and in the absence of consistency of results across ages and within phthalate metabolites, we consider it likely that the few statistically significant associations observed may be due to chance and they should therefore be interpreted with caution. Despite inconsistencies between studies and the few associations obtained in the present work, several mechanisms have been described to explain the potential health effects of phthalates on the developing brain, including hormonal disruption (thyroid hormones), alteration of the calcium signaling and the lipid metabolism and the activation of peroxisome proliferatoractivated receptors (PPAR) (Boas et al, 2012;Miodovnik et al, 2014). Several factors could explain our findings and those of previous studies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 45%
“…In humans, several prospective birth cohort studies, most of them including a relatively small study population, have reported adverse effects of prenatal phthalate exposure on the cognitive, psychomotor and behavioral development of children (Table 1). However, reported effects are not consistent across the different phthalate congeners and outcomes assessed and, additionally, there is not a clear gender specificity of the effects observed (Bellinger, 2013;Miodovnik et al, 2014). One of the main limitations of previous studies is that prenatal phthalate exposure was determined in a single spot urine measurement, which can lead to exposure misclassification, as phthalates have a short half-life (of hours) and are rapidly excreted from the body (Hoppin et al, 2002;Braun et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…preterm birth, low birth weight and decreased birth length) Huang et al, 2009;Latini et al, 2003;Meeker et al, 2009;Minatoya et al, 2017;Philippat et al, 2012;Wolff et al, 2008;Zhang et al, 2009), and impaired children growth (Valvi et al, 2015) and neurodevelopment (e.g. lower IQ, problems with attention, hyperactivity and poorer social communication) (Miodovnik et al, 2014). Furthermore, during the critical period of foetal/child development such as in utero period and the first few years of life, exposure to environmental chemicals will increase disease risk later in life (Barouki et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%