1984
DOI: 10.1016/0013-4694(84)90196-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developmental and aging changes in somatosensory, auditory and visual evoked potentials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

14
96
2
7

Year Published

1986
1986
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 214 publications
(119 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
14
96
2
7
Order By: Relevance
“…But, the data for amplitude variation in different age-groups is conflicting, with some studies depicting a decrease in the amplitude with age while some suggested that in the adult life the amplitude remained reasonably stable while in the first decade of life the mean amplitude was almost double of the adult value. [6,9] The present study could not find any significant variation in the amplitudes among the various age-groups. The mean interocular latency difference (0.64 ms±0.71) was another PRVEP parameter tested among the various agegroups but no statistically significant variation was found (Table 1).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 78%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…But, the data for amplitude variation in different age-groups is conflicting, with some studies depicting a decrease in the amplitude with age while some suggested that in the adult life the amplitude remained reasonably stable while in the first decade of life the mean amplitude was almost double of the adult value. [6,9] The present study could not find any significant variation in the amplitudes among the various age-groups. The mean interocular latency difference (0.64 ms±0.71) was another PRVEP parameter tested among the various agegroups but no statistically significant variation was found (Table 1).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 78%
“…[4] Age-related changes in P100 latencies can be attributed to the decline in the visual functions with aging. [1,[6][7][8] Mean N75-P100 amplitudes were not found to be statistically significant (p>0.05), when assessed in the different age groups (table 1). The mean amplitude for the right eye was 6.84µv±2.11 SD and for the left eye was 6.69 µv±2.03 SD, with the mean value of 6.77±1.99 S.D.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3), along with higher amplitudes and a shift of the P100 peak for children. A decrease in the amplitudes of VEP with age has been repeatedly described using different kinds of visual stimuli (Allison et al, 1984;Brecelj et al, 2002;Hoffmann et al, 2001;Holcomb, Coffey and Neville, 1992;Mahajan and McArtur, 2012;Taylor et al, 2004). Larger amplitudes in children have been attributed to less thick skulls or to generators being closer to the surface electrode in smaller brains (Chauveau et al, 2004;Picton and Taylor, 2007).…”
Section: P1-n1 Range: Pre-linguistic Processesmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The amount of change varies, but it is usually between 1 and 2 ms per year (Brown, Marsh, & LaRue, 1983;Ford & Pfefferbaum, 1985;Picton et al, 1984;Goodin, Squires, Henderson, & Starr, 1978). The reasons for the age-related changes in P300 latency are not completely clear, although since nerve conduction time does increase with age (Allison, Hume, Wood, & Goff, 1984), this must account for part of the change in P300 latency. The change in amplitude may be related to a shifting scalp distribution.…”
Section: Appendix C Stimulus Modality and Subject Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%