2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.mineng.2005.07.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of water split model for a 76mm hydrocyclone

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As reported by many authors (Plitt et al, 1987;Concha et al, 1996), the separation performance of an industrial hydrocyclone is controlled by the cone ratio (ratio of the spigot to the vortex finder). Shah et al (2006) suggested that the use of cone ratio as a design variable is insignificant and can sometimes be misleading. The diameter of the vortex finder (D o ) and spigot (D u ) individually has an effect on the water split behavior in hydrocyclone.…”
Section: Effect Of Outlet Diameters (Design Variables)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As reported by many authors (Plitt et al, 1987;Concha et al, 1996), the separation performance of an industrial hydrocyclone is controlled by the cone ratio (ratio of the spigot to the vortex finder). Shah et al (2006) suggested that the use of cone ratio as a design variable is insignificant and can sometimes be misleading. The diameter of the vortex finder (D o ) and spigot (D u ) individually has an effect on the water split behavior in hydrocyclone.…”
Section: Effect Of Outlet Diameters (Design Variables)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, as a series of studies, to simplify the verification process, the water split was adopted to verify the simulation results. Note that the water split means that the ratio of water reporting through each outlet, which clearly influences the device classification efficiency [21]; thus, this parameter can be used to verify the CFD simulation [22].…”
Section: Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the past few decades, several models (Moder and Dahlstrom, 1952;Yoshioka and Hotta, 1955;Abbot, 1962;Bradly, 1965;Plitt et al, 1990;Shah et al, 2006;Narasimha et al, 2014;Banerjee et al, 2015) have been proposed to compute water split in classifying cyclones. The aforementioned models are, however, far from being adequate to address various intricate issues of complex hydrodynamic features.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%