2005
DOI: 10.1117/12.601727
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of vehicle intelligent monitoring system (VIMS)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several efforts examined the possibility of estimating the IRI or the elevation profile from accelerometer data but have not derived a theoretical relationship. A research team from the University of Tokyo found that the root-mean-square (RMS) of the accelerometer signal was correlated to the elevation profile data (Fujino et al 2005). A team from the University of Pretoria (South Africa) found that it is possible to train an artificial neural network to estimate the elevation profile from accelerometer data, within 20% accuracy (Ngwangwa et al 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several efforts examined the possibility of estimating the IRI or the elevation profile from accelerometer data but have not derived a theoretical relationship. A research team from the University of Tokyo found that the root-mean-square (RMS) of the accelerometer signal was correlated to the elevation profile data (Fujino et al 2005). A team from the University of Pretoria (South Africa) found that it is possible to train an artificial neural network to estimate the elevation profile from accelerometer data, within 20% accuracy (Ngwangwa et al 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Siringoringo and Fujino [30] study a similar approach for the estimation of the bridge fundamental frequency. Theoretical simulations and a full-scale field experiment are carried out to support their approach, which is aimed at periodic bridge inspections using accelerations of a light commercial vehicle [31]. In theoretical simulations and a parametric study, it is shown that bridge frequency can be extracted from the vehicle response.…”
Section: Indirect Bridge Frequencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other indirect approaches have been developed which aim to measure road surface profile from the acceleration response of a moving vehicle [31,51]. The vehicle intelligent monitoring system (VIMS) presented by Fujino et al [31] targets highway pavements and bridge expansion joints and also utilizes a GPS sensor mounted in the vehicle to identify the position where the acceleration response is recorded. The theory behind such algorithms and techniques incorporates optimisation, transfer and correlation functions which may provide a basis to further reduce the influence that road surface profile has on vehicle acceleration measurements.…”
Section: Effect Of Road Surface Profile On Vehicle-bridge Interactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Siringoringo and Fujino [14,15] note that expansion joints excite vehicle bounce and pitch motions and their dominance in the vehicle dynamic response can hide the bridge response. Therefore, it is recommended that this part of the signal should not be considered if bridge dynamic parameters are of interest.…”
Section: Bridge Frequency Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these types of methods, summarised by Malekjafarian et al [7], lack comprehensive experimental verification, with very few field trials reported in the literature. Those reporting successful results have been primarily limited to bridge frequency identification, such as the experiments by Lin and Yang [6] utilising a trucktrailer configuration, or the light commercial vehicle employed by both Siringoringo and Fujino [14] and Fujino et al [15]. In general, speeds below 40 km/h have been found to provide the most accurate bridge frequency identification results due to improved spectral resolution and the reduced influence of road profile on the vehicle response, while modal analysis of the test vehicle is recommended before field testing commences.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%