1988
DOI: 10.1016/0732-8893(88)90078-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of urease conjugated enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) for the detection of IgM and IgG antibodies against Mycoplasma pneumoniae in human sera

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The final supernatant was precipitated with a final concentration of 3 M sodium acetate (NaOAC) pH 7.5 and 2 volumes ethanol added. The samples were placed at -20°C for 12 h. DNA was recovered following a 10 min centrifugation at 12000 g, 4"C, followed by a wash in 70% ethanol, centrifugation as before and resuspension of the DNA pellet in 100 p1 Tris/EDTA (10 Table I). Mp-1 was included for three-primer DNA amplification and confirmation that the amplified products were indeed M .…”
Section: N a E X T R A C T I O Nmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The final supernatant was precipitated with a final concentration of 3 M sodium acetate (NaOAC) pH 7.5 and 2 volumes ethanol added. The samples were placed at -20°C for 12 h. DNA was recovered following a 10 min centrifugation at 12000 g, 4"C, followed by a wash in 70% ethanol, centrifugation as before and resuspension of the DNA pellet in 100 p1 Tris/EDTA (10 Table I). Mp-1 was included for three-primer DNA amplification and confirmation that the amplified products were indeed M .…”
Section: N a E X T R A C T I O Nmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Culture is time-consuming, taking several weeks to produce results and is relatively insensitive (Dorigo-Zetsma et al, 1999;Harris et al, 1988;Kok et al, 1988). Serological methods are insufficiently sensitive and require paired serum samples from the acute and convalescent phases of the disease, thus only allowing a retrospective diagnosis (Dorigo-Zetsma et al, 1999;Chia et al, 1988;Sillis, 1990;Fedorko et al, 1995). More rapid, higher sensitivity methods were therefore developed, one of them being the PCR for fragments of the P1 gene or the 16S rRNA gene (Dorigo-Zetsma et al, 1999;Tjhie et al, 1994;Ieven et al, 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An accurate diagnosis with convalescentphase samples is often made many days after the onset of disease (28). Sensitivity and specificity values are between 55 and 100%, depending on the serological method used and the patient population tested (1,4,8,10,15,18,25). PCR has been shown to offer the potential of increased sensitivity and rapidity compared to other diagnostic tests.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%