5th Brunei International Conference on Engineering and Technology (BICET 2014) 2014
DOI: 10.1049/cp.2014.1101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of upper limb rehabilitation robot prototype for home setting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the mechanisms of exoskeletons and semi-exoskeletons must be reconfigured to be used for both left and right arm or else an exoskeleton must be built for each human arm. Regarding portable mechanisms, they generally perform restricted trajectories limited by their mechanical structures [15][16][17]. Although there are portable end-effector mechanisms that can reproduce customizable trajectories [18,19] they require long links to cover most of the human arm workspace.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the mechanisms of exoskeletons and semi-exoskeletons must be reconfigured to be used for both left and right arm or else an exoskeleton must be built for each human arm. Regarding portable mechanisms, they generally perform restricted trajectories limited by their mechanical structures [15][16][17]. Although there are portable end-effector mechanisms that can reproduce customizable trajectories [18,19] they require long links to cover most of the human arm workspace.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, since patients require assistance during the execution of repetitive movements and robotic system advantage this process [5,6], a lot of devices have been developed to support the upper limb exercises. For example, in [7] a support system is projected to allow movement on vertical elbow flexion and shoulder/elbow horizontal flexion and extension. However, the device only conducts fundamental motions, but it does not carry out other paths.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, it should be mechanically reconfigured for right and left human arm. On the other hand, the portable devices referred in [7][8][9]19] are portable devices with light frames which could eventually be used as home devices with the proper supervision of a specialist. However, they have predefined paths that cannot be modified due their mechanical shapes, thus the number of exercises or trajectories that they can offer is very limited.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the device has large links and presents stiffness problems. In [ 24 ], an end-effector device is proposed to assist the arm motion. The forearm of the user is supported by an end-effector device, and the device can assist the shoulder/elbow flexion and extension without other trajectories.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As seen in the above examples, the main issues to consider about the existing devices for arm motion are that the devices with a large workspace are very difficult to transport, construct, and wear as seen in [ 18 – 23 ]; the existing portable devices cover a small workspace [ 16 , 24 28 ] and offer few types of exercises [ 24 , 25 ]; and the widely used basic mechanisms do not have motion control during the therapy or they perform a single trajectory as seen in [ 15 , 17 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%