2017
DOI: 10.4158/ep161410.cr
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development Of Type 1 Diabetes After Cancer Immunotherapy

Abstract: Objective: Nivolumab, anti-programmed cell death 1 monoclonal antibody, is a newly Food and Drug Administration-approved biologic for the treatment of metastatic melanoma. New indications for treatment of other cancers have been recently granted. Nivolumab package insert reads: "Warnings and Precautions: immunemediated pneumonitis, colitis, hepatitis, nephritis and renal dysfunction, hypothyroidism and hyperthyroidism may occur." Development of type 1 diabetes as an adverse event was not documented in the New … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Supplementary Table 1 (see section on supplementary data given at the end of this article) provides an overview of our search terms. Additionally, the authors reviewed the reference lists of the included articles (4, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68) and identified five additional cases (69, 70, 71, 72). The following data were extracted from each manuscript: author, year of publication, age, gender and ethnicity of the patient, cancer type, checkpoint inhibitor therapy, number of cycles of therapy, prior immunotherapy, relevant past medical history (PMH), presence of diabetic ketoacidosis, glycemia, glycated hemoglobin, C-peptide, islet autoantibodies, lipase, other irAE and HLA genotype.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Supplementary Table 1 (see section on supplementary data given at the end of this article) provides an overview of our search terms. Additionally, the authors reviewed the reference lists of the included articles (4, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68) and identified five additional cases (69, 70, 71, 72). The following data were extracted from each manuscript: author, year of publication, age, gender and ethnicity of the patient, cancer type, checkpoint inhibitor therapy, number of cycles of therapy, prior immunotherapy, relevant past medical history (PMH), presence of diabetic ketoacidosis, glycemia, glycated hemoglobin, C-peptide, islet autoantibodies, lipase, other irAE and HLA genotype.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Baseline characteristics are presented in Table 2 . In addition to our patients, 171 cases were identified [ 7 , 8 , [11] , [12] , [13] , [14] , [15] , [16] , [17] , [18] , [19] , [20] , [21] , [22] , [23] , [24] , [25] , [26] , [27] , [28] , [29] , [30] , [31] , [32] , [33] , [34] , [35] , [36] , [37] , [38] , [39] , [40] , [41] , [42] , [43] , [44] , [45] , [46] , [47] , [48] , [49] , [50] , [51] , [52] , [53] , [54] , [55] , [56] , [57] , [58] , [59] , [60] , [61] , [62] , [63] , [64] , [65] , [66] , [67] , [68] , [69] , [70] , [71] , [72] , [73] , [74] , [...…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
“…8 The current hypothesis is that PD-1 inhibitors cause T1DM by activation of autoreactive CD8+ T-cells that have the ability both to survive and to destroy β-cells. 9 Recent reports suggest that the use of PD-1 and PD-L-1 agents may lead to a 1% chance of diabetes mellitus (DM) occurrence, including new-onset T1DM or worsening of type 2 DM (T2DM). 4,10 In patients who develop T1DM, the mechanism appears similar to the permanent autoimmune process of T1DM, but with faster, aggressive destruction of beta islet cells, likely mediated by T-cells, requiring insulin replacement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%