The worldwide pandemic of 2019 novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) has posed the most substantial and severe public health issue for several generations, and therapeutic options have not yet been optimised. Vitamin D (in its “parent” form, cholecalciferol) has been proposed in the pharmacological management of COVID-19 by various sources. We aimed to determine whether COVID-19 mortality was affected by serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) levels, vitamin D status, or cholecalciferol therapy, and to elucidate any other predictors of COVID-19 mortality. Patients hospitalised with COVID-19 were opportunistically recruited from three UK hospitals, and their data were collected retrospectively. Logistic regression was used to determine any relationships between COVID-19 mortality and potential predictors, including 25(OH)D levels and cholecalciferol booster therapy. A total of 986 participants with COVID-19 were studied, of whom 151 (16.0%) received cholecalciferol booster therapy. In the primary cohort of 444 patients, cholecalciferol booster therapy was associated with a reduced risk of COVID-19 mortality, following adjustment for potential confounders (ORadj 0.13, 95% CI 0.05–0.35, p < 0.001). This finding was replicated in a validation cohort of 541 patients (ORadj 0.38, 95% CI 0.17–0.84, p = 0.018). In this observational study, treatment with cholecalciferol booster therapy, regardless of baseline serum 25(OH)D levels, appears to be associated with a reduced risk of mortality in acute in-patients admitted with COVID-19. Further work with large population studies needs to be carried out to determine adequate serum 25(OH)D levels, as well as multi-dose clinical trials of cholecalciferol therapy to assess maximum efficacy.
The calculated prevalence was 110 per million population. The cause was attributed to autoimmune destruction of the adrenal cortex in 81 (93%). There were two cases of metastatic malignancy and three unrelated cases of late onset adrenoleukodystrophy, but none were attributable to tuberculosis. Twenty-one new cases were diagnosed between 1987 and 1993. The calculated incidence was 5.6 per million per annum. The biochemical basis of the diagnosis was reviewed in these 21 patients and as a result firm criteria are suggested for the interpretation of the short Synacthen test; criteria for normality being baseline cortisol>250 and 30 minute peak >600 nmol/l, taking into account clinical circumstances.
Gastric emptying is a significant determinant of the blood glucose response after an oral carbohydrate load [1] due to the key role this process plays in regulating the rate of nutrient delivery to the small intestine. Gastric emptying may therefore be a previously under-recognized contributor to variations in glycaemic control in diabetes mellitus. Faster rates of gastric emptying have been reported not only in rat models of insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) [2,3] but also in patients with IDDM [4,5] and recent studies suggest that modulation of gastric emptying could be used to improve glycaemic control in patients with diabetes [6].Amylin is a 37 amino acid polypeptide co-secreted with insulin by pancreatic beta cells, in response to nutrient stimuli. It circulates at concentrations of 5±30 pmol/l in normal subjects. IDDM patients are not only insulin deficient but also amylin deficient [7,8]. Amylin concentrations in IDDM patients range from the lower end of the normal range to undetectable and do not increase in response to a glucose load. The peptide pramlintide is a stable trisub- Diabetologia (1998) Summary In a previous study we have shown that an intravenous infusion of pramlintide (an analogue of human amylin) delayed gastric emptying, but the dose of pramlintide was supraphysiological in relation to the amylin response to food in non-diabetic subjects. The purpose of this study was to examine the dose response relationship of subcutaneous injections of pramlintide on gastric emptying and to determine whether administration of the drug before one meal has an impact on the subsequent meal. Eleven men with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus were studied in a double-blind, randomised, four-way crossover design. None had autonomic neuropathy. Euglycaemia was maintained overnight before the study day. At 30 min the patients self-injected their usual morning insulin and at 15 min they injected the study drug (either placebo or 30, 60 or 90 mg pramlintide) subcutaneously. At 0 min they ate a standard meal consisting of a pancake, labelled with 99m Tc, and a milkshake containing 3-ortho-methylglucose (3-OMG). Gastric emptying images were obtained for the next 8 h. At 240 min the subjects ate a similar meal, but on this occasion the pancake was labelled with 111 In. All three doses of pramlintide delayed emptying of the solid component of the first meal (p < 0.004) with no significant difference between the drug doses. There were no differences between placebo and pramlintide after the second meal. All three doses of pramlintide resulted in a prolongation in the time to peak plasma 3-OMG level (p < 0.0001) after the first meal but there was no difference after the second meal. [Diabetologia (1998) 41: 577±583]
Pramlintide, a human amylin analogue, reduces hyperglycaemia after meals in patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM). We investigated whether this was due to delayed gastric emptying. Eight men with uncomplicated IDDM were studied twice in a randomised, double-blind crossover design. Euglycaemia was maintained overnight by intravenous infusion of glucose and/or insulin and the following morning a 5-h infusion of pramlintide 25 micrograms/h or placebo was started at 08.00 hours. At 08.30 hours the patients injected their normal morning insulin dose subcutaneously and 30 min later ate a meal (600 kcal, 50% carbohydrate) of which the solid component was labelled with Technetium-99 m and the liquid with Indium-111 to quantify gastric emptying. Gamma-scintigraphic images were obtained every 20 min for the next 4 h. Insulin and glucose were infused as necessary to maintain blood glucose levels within 3 mmol/l of the pre-meal value. Compared to placebo, pramlintide significantly delayed emptying of both liquid (median lag time 69 vs 7.5 min) and solid (median lag time 150 vs 44.5 min) components of the meal. Pramlintide delayed gastric emptying so much that t50 values could not be calculated for solid or liquid. Amylin agonists such as pramlintide may, therefore, be of value in improving glycaemic control in IDDM by modifying gastric emptying.
At a blood glucose concentration of approximately 15 mmol/l, 1) gastric emptying of a solid meal is slower, when compared with euglycemia, even after administration of erythromycin; 2) the effect of erythromycin on gastric emptying of a solid meal is attenuated; and 3) the perception of postprandial hunger is reduced.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.