2021
DOI: 10.1515/noise-2021-0013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of traffic noise prediction model for major arterial roads of tier-II city of India (Surat) using artificial neural network

Abstract: In the issue of expanding noise levels the world over, road traffic noise is main contributor. The investigation of street traffic noise in urban communities is a significant issue. Ample opportunity has already passed to understand the significance of noise appraisal through prediction models with the goal that assurance against street traffic noise can be actualized. Noise predictions models are utilized in an increasing range of decision-making applications. This study’s main objective is to assess ambient … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…R 2 values in the range of 0.81 to 0.85 were attained by studies in Indian cities like Delhi, Patiala (Garg et al, 2015;Kumar et al, 2014;Singh et al, 2016), Chongqing city, China (Chen et al, 2020), and New Klang Valley, Malaysia (Ahmed et al, 2021). However, studies in Surat City, India, and Granada, Spain, showed a slightly lower R 2 ranging from 0.75-0.76 (Genaro et al, 2010;Ranpise et al, 2021). A novel approach employed an Emotional Neural Network in Nicosia, North Cyprus, resulting in an R 2 of 0.81 (Nourani et al, 2020).…”
Section: Comparative Analysis Based On Goodness Of Fitmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…R 2 values in the range of 0.81 to 0.85 were attained by studies in Indian cities like Delhi, Patiala (Garg et al, 2015;Kumar et al, 2014;Singh et al, 2016), Chongqing city, China (Chen et al, 2020), and New Klang Valley, Malaysia (Ahmed et al, 2021). However, studies in Surat City, India, and Granada, Spain, showed a slightly lower R 2 ranging from 0.75-0.76 (Genaro et al, 2010;Ranpise et al, 2021). A novel approach employed an Emotional Neural Network in Nicosia, North Cyprus, resulting in an R 2 of 0.81 (Nourani et al, 2020).…”
Section: Comparative Analysis Based On Goodness Of Fitmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Therefore, several amendments to existing noise models are required for traffic noise calculations [14] and reviewing the standard road traffic noise model is vital to road traffic noise mapping. Sounds from engine noise, tire and road friction, road surface type, and rolling noise are the main contributors to the generation of traffic noise [15]. Furthermore, road traffic, human qualities [16], transportation networks, and environmental conditions all lead to increased traffic noise pollution [17].…”
Section: Road Traffic Noise and Visualizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They took into account the normality and non-normality of participation for various noise parameters, such as noise intensity, exposure period, and the impacted age group of people in a specific location, and graphical depictions were created for the model's overall rationale [28]. Ranpise et al ( 2021) measured ambient noise levels along key arterial roads in Surat, compared them to mandated criteria, and developed a noise prediction model for arterial roads based on an ANN with a feed-forward back propagation method for training [29]. Machine learning (ML) modelling approaches were utilised by Ali et al (2019) to accurately estimate roadway traffic noise.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%