2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.firesaf.2012.08.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of the unsteady upward fire model to simulate polymer burning under UL94 vertical test conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Equation 3Assuming values for the heat transfer coefficients, polymer conductivity, flame temperature and water temperature, it is possible to investigate the effect of wall thickness and water temperature on the temperature profile across the polymer wall. The values for hh and Th were adopted from the work of Wang et al [29,30] to represent the effective heat transfer coefficient and temperature of a flame consistent with UL 94 standards. The value for k was chosen as a mid-range value for polymers.…”
Section: Heat Transfer Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Equation 3Assuming values for the heat transfer coefficients, polymer conductivity, flame temperature and water temperature, it is possible to investigate the effect of wall thickness and water temperature on the temperature profile across the polymer wall. The values for hh and Th were adopted from the work of Wang et al [29,30] to represent the effective heat transfer coefficient and temperature of a flame consistent with UL 94 standards. The value for k was chosen as a mid-range value for polymers.…”
Section: Heat Transfer Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The material properties for air and water were taken without modification from the material library. The outer walls were assumed to be adiabatic whilst the heat from the flame was modelled by applying a heat transfer coefficient of 54.3 W/mK and a flame temperature of 2026 K to the bottom 10 mm of the sample, based on the findings of Wang et al [29,30]. The outer walls were assumed to be adiabatic whilst the heat from the flame was modelled by applying a 54.3 W/mK heat transfer coefficient and a flame temperature of 2026 K across a 20 mm wide section on the bottom surfaces.…”
Section: Thermal Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerical and experimental tests have been performed in melt burning research [2,3] Moreover, experimental research on the melt/drip effects have been carried out at different scales by standard and self-designed facilities [4][5][6][7]. In these experiments, specimens from eight commercial products (all densities are more than 550 kg/m 3 ), have been tested with UL94 in vertical burning test conditions [4]: mass loss rate, first drop mass and diameter, first dripping time were used to describe the melt/drip effect in the experiment.…”
Section: *mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a variety of experiments in this direction, still sporadic to some extent, but providing step-by-step enough amount of data about the fire behavior of thermoplastics in fire, especially the foams. In this context, simulation of polymer burning under UL94 vertical test conditions based on mass loss rate to investigate the change in density to the predicted have been carried out [7]. As a supporting technique, TG experiments have been used to estimate the onset of melting and then to provide adequate results for modeling both the melting and pyrolysis stages [8].…”
Section: *mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cone calorimeter became the premier dynamic research tool based on the principle of oxygen consumption calorimetry. The UL 94 V test is widely used both in industry and academic research centers, and is intended to meet industrial requirements as well as to hierarchically classify the polymeric materials [30]. UL 94 flame rating groups materials into categories based on their flammability.…”
Section: Recent Developments In Different Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%