2010
DOI: 10.15554/pcij.06012010.86.101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of the northeast extreme tee (NEXT) beam for accelerated bridge construction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using lightweight concrete in the members can reduce shipping costs and possibly increase available span lengths (Culmo and Seraderian 2010 …”
Section: Accelerated Bridge Constructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using lightweight concrete in the members can reduce shipping costs and possibly increase available span lengths (Culmo and Seraderian 2010 …”
Section: Accelerated Bridge Constructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, the Precast/Prestressed Concrete Institute (PCI) northeast in the US developed a new beam section, called as NEXT beam, for the purpose of accelerating bridge construction process [1,2]. A NEXT beam consists of two beam stems spaced at 1.524 m (5 ft) on centers, as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A NEXT beam consists of two beam stems spaced at 1.524 m (5 ft) on centers, as shown in Fig. 1 [1,2]. The beam depth varies from 0.610 m (24 in) to 0.914 m (36 in) with 0.102 m (4 in) increments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Precast Adjacent Box Girders This type of system consists of precast beams with an integral deck separated by a closure joint, eliminating the need to form and pour a concrete deck on the site [6]. There are multiple shapes for these girders: in the form of a rectangular prism, which is an ideal choice for short-span bridges [25]; in the form of a trapezoid, which can be a closed or open box and has the advantage of spanning the entire bridge with a reduced number of girders compared to other box girders [26]; and a box girder with an integral deck that uses post-tensioning and has the advantage of having a low height, allowing for its use for sites with limited clearance [25].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first is the NEXT F beam, where the top flange is used to support a cast-in-place reinforced concrete deck, and the second type is the NEXT D beam consisting of a precast integral deck [29]. The system has the advantages of being satisfactory for projects with clearance limitations and having a higher load capacity than standard double-T and box girders [5,25].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%