Development of the Condensed Heuristic Academic Research Model (CHARM) framework for short-term nursing research groups

Thornton, Clifton P.; Rivers, Emerald; Rhodes, Christopher; Kang, Harmeet Kaur; Rodney, Tamar

doi:10.1016/j.outlook.2020.04.001

Cited by 3 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Of the 18,642 records captured by our search strategy, 59 studies met the inclusion criteria. 12–70 The main reason for excluding articles was that the collaboration was not for the purpose of research. For example, some frameworks described collaboration for purposes of capacity building or sharing data and biobanks.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Health Research Collaborations by Academic Entities: A Systematic Review

Sbaity¹,

Zahwe²,

Helou³

et al. 2023

Academic Medicine

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose To review the literature on health research collaborations by academic entities and to identify the main phases, components, and concepts of these research collaborations. Method The authors conducted a systematic review of the literature, searching 4 databases in March 2022 for studies on health research collaboration between an academic entity (individual, group, or institution) and any other entity included. They excluded non–health-related studies and studies in which collaboration was not for the purpose of research. From included studies, reviewers abstracted data about the 4 main phases of research collaborations (initiation, conduct, monitoring, and evaluation) and synthesized their corresponding components and concepts using thematic analysis method. Results A total of 59 studies met inclusion criteria. These studies described building research collaborations between an academic entity and other academic entities (n = 29; 49%), communities (n = 28; 47%), industry (n = 7; 12%), and/or governmental entities (n = 4; 7%). Of the 59 studies, 22 addressed 2 phases of collaboration, 20 addressed 3 phases, and 17 addressed all 4 phases. All included studies described at least 1 of the components relevant to the initiation phase and at least 1 relevant to the conduct phase. Team structure was the most common component discussed in relation to the initiation phase (n = 48; 81%), and team dynamics was the most common component discussed in relation to the conduct phase (n = 55; 93%). At least 1 of the components relevant to the monitoring phase was reported in 36 studies, and at least 1 component relevant to the evaluation phase was reported in 28 studies. Conclusions This review provides important information for groups aiming to engage in collaborative research. The synthesized list of collaboration phases and their components can serve as a road map for collaborators at different steps of their research.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Health Research Collaborations by Academic Entities: A Systematic Review

Sbaity¹,

Zahwe²,

Helou³

et al. 2023

Academic Medicine

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Nursing practice and research have begun to embrace new technologies more actively and are expanding their scope and applicability. The framework of nursing research has also been shifting towards collaborative research teams rather than individual research [ 15 ]. As nursing educators and researchers, we must lead a successful transition to a new normal, beyond overcoming the crisis, by collecting and sharing the changes accelerated by the pandemic.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Introduction to the Special Issue: “Nursing Education and Research in the Remote Era”

Kang¹

2021

Asian Nursing Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Joint Research Mentoring Through the Community of Young Research Peers: A Case for a Unifying Model for Research Mentorship at Higher Learning Institutions

Balandya¹,

Sunguya²,

Kidenya³

et al. 2022

AMEP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Mentorship is pivotal for sustainability of a successful research culture at higher learning institutions. Various models have been proposed for provision of research mentorship in health sciences but are challenged by utilizing predominantly hierarchical mentoring, as well as being centred on one discipline or one institution. This paper describes the approach and successes of an inclusive mentorship model employed in a resource-limited setting in sub-Saharan Africa. Methods Through the NIH-funded Transforming Health Professions Education in Tanzania (THET) project, a consortium of three prominent health sciences higher learning institutions in Tanzania (MUHAS, CUHAS and KCMUCo) and two collaborating US institutions (UCSF and Duke University) was formed. Within THET, the Community of Young Research Peers (CYRP) was constituted, comprised two cohorts of undergraduate students and young faculty (fellows), and senior scientists. Besides mentorship and research training, fellows received funded research awards and in turn mentored undergraduate students. Results By the first quarter of project year four, the number of fellows and mentored undergraduate students had increased from 12 to 24 and from 41 to 67, respectively. Fellows in the second cohort (junior fellows) included medical doctors, nurses, dentist, biomedical scientist, sociologist and education psychologist. In fostering peer-to-peer mentoring, the cross-institutional pairs of fellows from the first cohort (senior fellows) were assigned to reciprocal pairs of junior fellow mentees and took a leading role in research training. Furthermore, the senior fellows had made significant strides, including eight enrolled in PhD programmes, eight publications from mentored research projects, and six small to medium-size research grants won. Conclusion The unifying model of research mentorship employed by the CYRP has been demonstrated as an effective model for joint research mentorship of the diverse group of young investigators from collaborating higher learning institutions in Tanzania. This model is recommended for scale-up, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa.

show abstract

Development of the Condensed Heuristic Academic Research Model (CHARM) framework for short-term nursing research groups

Cited by 3 publications

References 5 publications

Health Research Collaborations by Academic Entities: A Systematic Review

Health Research Collaborations by Academic Entities: A Systematic Review

Introduction to the Special Issue: “Nursing Education and Research in the Remote Era”

Joint Research Mentoring Through the Community of Young Research Peers: A Case for a Unifying Model for Research Mentorship at Higher Learning Institutions

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About