2022
DOI: 10.2147/amep.s356678
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Joint Research Mentoring Through the Community of Young Research Peers: A Case for a Unifying Model for Research Mentorship at Higher Learning Institutions

Abstract: Background Mentorship is pivotal for sustainability of a successful research culture at higher learning institutions. Various models have been proposed for provision of research mentorship in health sciences but are challenged by utilizing predominantly hierarchical mentoring, as well as being centred on one discipline or one institution. This paper describes the approach and successes of an inclusive mentorship model employed in a resource-limited setting in sub-Saharan Africa. Met… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We identified three key approaches from the included studies that have been used for mentoring health researchers in Africa. Broadly, we have categorized these into international collaborative programs (1416, 19, 24, 33), regional and in-country collaborations (17, 18, 20, 23, 31), and specialized capacity building programs (21, 22, 2528, 30, 32, 34).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…We identified three key approaches from the included studies that have been used for mentoring health researchers in Africa. Broadly, we have categorized these into international collaborative programs (1416, 19, 24, 33), regional and in-country collaborations (17, 18, 20, 23, 31), and specialized capacity building programs (21, 22, 2528, 30, 32, 34).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The studies were from 12 different African countries including Kenya, Tanzania, Uganda, Ethiopia, Nigeria, South Africa, Malawi, Ghana, Liberia, Zimbabwe, Rwanda, and Lesotho. The primary studies used diverse methods which included qualitative designs (10 studies; 48%) (15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24), quantitative designs (9 studies; 43%) (25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33), and mixed methods (2 studies; (9%) (32,33).…”
Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The average mean score implies that a higher number of respondents agreed that university performance in Tanzania is well measured with publications, enrolment, and graduation rates. Balandya et al, (2022) also used number of publications to gauge Tanzania's higher education best performance.…”
Section: Descriptive Analysis For Performance Of Universities In Tanz...mentioning
confidence: 99%