2018
DOI: 10.1007/s11032-018-0885-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of species diagnostic SNP markers for quality control genotyping in four rice (Oryza L.) species

Abstract: Species misclassification (misidentification) and handling errors have been frequently reported in various plant species conserved at diverse gene banks, which could restrict use of germplasm for correct purpose. The objectives of the present study were to (i) determine the extent of genotyping error (reproducibility) on DArTseq-based single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs); (ii) determine the proportion of misclassified accessions across 3134 samples representing three African rice species complex (Oryza glabe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
40
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They recommended a set of 50-100 SNPs for routine QC after finding about 29% heterogeneity in inbred lines. In rice, [2] recommended a subset of 24-36 SNP markers filtered from DArTSeq developed markers for genetic purity analyses. In sweetpotato, QA/QC problems in breeding operations have been shown in the current manuscript by monitoring the rate of misclassification as materials moved through different stages of breeding trialing.…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They recommended a set of 50-100 SNPs for routine QC after finding about 29% heterogeneity in inbred lines. In rice, [2] recommended a subset of 24-36 SNP markers filtered from DArTSeq developed markers for genetic purity analyses. In sweetpotato, QA/QC problems in breeding operations have been shown in the current manuscript by monitoring the rate of misclassification as materials moved through different stages of breeding trialing.…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Development of user-friendly, low-cost, high-throughput markers for quality assurance and control (QA/QC) in a genomic-assisted breeding (GAB) era is a critically important aspect in crop improvement and germplasm conservation [1,2]. This is because genetic fidelity and trueness-to-type are often not phenotypically obvious.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They recommended a set of 50-100 SNPs for routine QC after finding about 29% heterogeneity in inbred lines. In rice, Ndjiondjop et al 2018 recommended a subset of 24-36 SNP markers filtered from DArTSeq developed markers for genetic purity analyses. In sweetpotato, QA/QC problems have recently been acknowledged ( Gemenet et al 2019a ) by monitoring the rate of misclassification as materials moved through different stages of breeding trialing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Development of user-friendly, low-cost, high-throughput markers for quality assurance and control (QA/QC) in a genomic-assisted breeding era is a critically important aspect in crop improvement and germplasm conservation ( Semagn et al 2012; Ndjiondjop et al 2018 ). This is because genetic fidelity and trueness-to-type are often not phenotypically obvious.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…About 92% of the African rice (Ndjiondjop et al 2017 ) and 43% of the Asian rice (Ndjiondjop et al 2018a ) samples had been previously used for genetic diversity and population structure studies conducted within each species. Nearly, all samples had also been used for identification of species- and subspecies-diagnostic SNPs for routine genotyping quality control analysis to minimize errors during germplasm collection, acquisition and routine genebank operations (Ndjiondjop et al 2018b ). The detailed procedures for genomic DNA extraction and SNP genotyping using DArTseq™ were described in our previous study (Ndjiondjop et al 2017 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%