1988
DOI: 10.2331/suisan.54.1321
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of radioimmunoassay for eel growth hormone.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
1

Year Published

1990
1990
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
(9 reference statements)
2
11
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Two possible reasons for this difference in "basal" growth hormone levels in trout in good condition are discussed in detail in an accompanying paper (Le Bail et al, 1991). In contrast to these findings, Kishida and Hirano (1988) did not find any difference in plasma growth hormone levels between fed and starved eels. Although the homologous growth hormone RIA they employed was quite sensitive, most fed and starved eels had undetectable plasma growth hormone levels.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 51%
“…Two possible reasons for this difference in "basal" growth hormone levels in trout in good condition are discussed in detail in an accompanying paper (Le Bail et al, 1991). In contrast to these findings, Kishida and Hirano (1988) did not find any difference in plasma growth hormone levels between fed and starved eels. Although the homologous growth hormone RIA they employed was quite sensitive, most fed and starved eels had undetectable plasma growth hormone levels.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 51%
“…Both production and secretion of GH in the eel pituitary seem to be normally under tonic inhibitory control, most likely by the hypothalamus, although presence of potential inhibitory factors in the blood is also possible. This seems to be in agreement with extremely low levels of GH in the eel plasma (less than 0.2 ng/ml; Kishida and Hirano 1988), although this could also be due to an extremely high metabolic clearance of the hormone. In the eel, SRIF fibers terminate on the basal lamina along GH cells, and changes in SRIF immunoreactivity have been observed after starvation suggesting that SRIF regulates GH release in the eel (Olivereau et al 1984).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…The eel GH RIA is more sensitive than the densitometric method; the minimum detectable levels of GH were 10 pg in the RIA (Kishida and Hirano 1988) and 1.5 + 0.3 tAg ovine PRL (mean + SEM, n = 6) in the densitometry. Furthermore, interassay coefficients of variation, calculated using the midrange of the assay, were 13.8% (n = 4) in the RIA and 17.7% (n = 3) in the densitometry.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations