2013
DOI: 10.7845/kjm.2013.3013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of PCR Diagnosis System for Plant Quarantine Seed-borne Wheat Streak Mosaic Virus

Abstract: Wheat streak mosaic virus (WSMV), a member of the genus Tritimovirus in Potyviridae, severely impacts wheat and corn seed worldwide, but has yet to be detected in Korea, and hence, every effort should be made to prevent its introduction. To prevent WSMV from entering the country, it is necessary to prepare a specific, sensitive, simple, and fast detection method for routine application to plant quarantine procedures. For this reason, a two-step diagnosis system consisting of RT-PCR and nested PCR is being used… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
24
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…및 종자전 염을 하고 Fribourg et al, 1977), 핵산은 3개의 단백질을 암호화하며 총 염기서열의 길이는 약 6.4 kb이다 (Koenig and Lesemann, 1981;Bernal et al, 2000). APLV는 파파리자, 비름과, 명아주과, 박과 및 가지과에서 감염 보고사례 (Gibbs and Harrison, 1969;Koenig and Bode, 1978 (Lee et al, 2013a;Lee et al, 2013c;Lee and Shin, 2014;Lee et al, 2014a;Lee et al, 2015)되어 바이러스 검역실적이 증가하였으나 (Shin, 2009;Lee et al, 2013b) 참 고 문 헌…”
Section: Andean Potato Latent Virus (Aplv)는 Group IV (+)unclassified
“…및 종자전 염을 하고 Fribourg et al, 1977), 핵산은 3개의 단백질을 암호화하며 총 염기서열의 길이는 약 6.4 kb이다 (Koenig and Lesemann, 1981;Bernal et al, 2000). APLV는 파파리자, 비름과, 명아주과, 박과 및 가지과에서 감염 보고사례 (Gibbs and Harrison, 1969;Koenig and Bode, 1978 (Lee et al, 2013a;Lee et al, 2013c;Lee and Shin, 2014;Lee et al, 2014a;Lee et al, 2015)되어 바이러스 검역실적이 증가하였으나 (Shin, 2009;Lee et al, 2013b) 참 고 문 헌…”
Section: Andean Potato Latent Virus (Aplv)는 Group IV (+)unclassified
“…Unfortunately the method is laden with issues of false positive reaction and low sensitivity (McGee, 1995;Caruso et al, 2003;Priou et al, 2006). As a result, molecular biological methods which are simpler and highly sensitive are at present the preferred choice in seed health testing procedures (Fonseca et al, 2005;Lee et al, 2013;Majumder et al, 2013;Munkvold, 2009;Park and Kim, 2004;Peiró et al, 2011).…”
Section: Serologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, when more than two kinds of viruses must be examined in the same seed, ELISA and PCR have to be applied separately, thereby wasting labor and manpower, and causing inconvenience in the quarantine site. Third, if the positive control sample group is not secured, PCR test errors and amplification or non-amplification are difficult to accurately assess [13]. Moreover, since the positive control group sample is infected with the virus, it may be difficult to distribute domestically and import [14].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%