2022
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.1c16723
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of Palladium on Bismuth Sulfide Nanorods as a Bifunctional Nanomaterial for Efficient Electrochemical Detection and Photoreduction of Hg(II) Ions

Abstract: A nanocomposite containing palladium nanoparticles embedded on bismuth sulfide nanorods (Pd@Bi2S3) was synthesized based on a solvothermal method. The structural features, composition, and morphology were characterized by XRD, FT-IR, FE-SEM-EDS, FE-TEM, HAADF-STEM, XPS, N2 physisorption, and UV–vis. Further electrochemical measurements by EIS, CV, DPV, and LSV techniques were done. It revealed that Pd@Bi2S3/GCE were exploited as electrochemical sensors for the detection of toxic mercuric ions (Hg2+), which pro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The following eq was used to compute the rates of charge transfer coefficient ( K s ) of bare GCE, SrWO 4 /GCE, g-C 3 N 4 /GCE, and SrWO 4 /g-C 3 N 4 /GCE R CT = italicRT n 2 F 2 K normals C where “ K s ” stands for the charge transfer rate, “ n ” stands for the number of electrons, “ C ” stands for a concentration of [Fe(CN) 6 ] 4–/3– , and “ R , T , and F ” represent their specific meanings. , The rate constant ( K s ) value of SrWO 4 /g-C 3 N 4 /GCE was determined to be 5.13 × 10 –7 cm/s, indicating that SrWO 4 /g-C 3 N 4 /GCE has a higher catalytic activity than other modified and unmodified electrodes such as bare GCE (1.74 × 10 –7 cm/s), SrWO 4 /GCE (4.14 × 10 –7 cm/s), and g-C 3 N 4 /GCE (2.89 × 10 –7 cm/s). Finally, the above electrical characteristic results confirmed that the SrWO 4 /g-C 3 N 4 /GCE composite possesses a high active surface, higher current density, quicker electron transfer, lower Δ E p , and higher charge transfer rate than SrWO 4 /GCE and g-C 3 N 4 /GCE.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following eq was used to compute the rates of charge transfer coefficient ( K s ) of bare GCE, SrWO 4 /GCE, g-C 3 N 4 /GCE, and SrWO 4 /g-C 3 N 4 /GCE R CT = italicRT n 2 F 2 K normals C where “ K s ” stands for the charge transfer rate, “ n ” stands for the number of electrons, “ C ” stands for a concentration of [Fe(CN) 6 ] 4–/3– , and “ R , T , and F ” represent their specific meanings. , The rate constant ( K s ) value of SrWO 4 /g-C 3 N 4 /GCE was determined to be 5.13 × 10 –7 cm/s, indicating that SrWO 4 /g-C 3 N 4 /GCE has a higher catalytic activity than other modified and unmodified electrodes such as bare GCE (1.74 × 10 –7 cm/s), SrWO 4 /GCE (4.14 × 10 –7 cm/s), and g-C 3 N 4 /GCE (2.89 × 10 –7 cm/s). Finally, the above electrical characteristic results confirmed that the SrWO 4 /g-C 3 N 4 /GCE composite possesses a high active surface, higher current density, quicker electron transfer, lower Δ E p , and higher charge transfer rate than SrWO 4 /GCE and g-C 3 N 4 /GCE.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To overcome these issues, various strategies, namely, doping of impurity, loading of cocatalyst, Schottky junction, and formation of p–n or n–n heterostructures with other semiconductors have been developed. Among them, the formation of a p–n heterojunction is a promising way to enhance PEC performance of the BiVO 4 photoanode. The formation of the p–n junction causes IEF at the interface between two semiconductors, and therefore, it promotes electron–hole pair separation and reduces charge recombination. For example, Ye et al reported a BiOI-BiVO 4 p–n junction electrode for water splitting application, and they showed a 3-fold higher PEC performance than BiVO 4 by reducing electron–hole recombination.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lowest concentration for quantitative detection of Hg 2+ by this method corresponded to 1 nM, which is lower than the allowable maximum residue limit of Hg 2+ (10 nM) in drinkable water as per the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 33,38 Compared with the previously reported methods for Hg 2+ measurement, [39][40][41][42][43] the proposed strategy for Hg 2+ shows much higher detection sensitivity (Table S2 †).…”
Section: Detection Of Hg 2+mentioning
confidence: 91%