2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0147-1767(02)00031-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of multiple IQ maps for use in the selection of inpatriate managers: a practical theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 97 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The bottom line is that that the same techniques traditionally used for the selection of expatriate managers should not be used in the selection process for inpatriate managers Harvey, Novicevic, & Kiessling, 2002). This paper does expand on the idea proposed by Harvey and colleagues in 2002; even though this paper does not strive to articulate the precise mechanics of revising the inpatriate selection process, instead it points out that a proper understanding and acknowledgement by global organizations of elements such as the inpatriate's: (1) assignment characteristics/dynamics (i.e.…”
Section: Recruitmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bottom line is that that the same techniques traditionally used for the selection of expatriate managers should not be used in the selection process for inpatriate managers Harvey, Novicevic, & Kiessling, 2002). This paper does expand on the idea proposed by Harvey and colleagues in 2002; even though this paper does not strive to articulate the precise mechanics of revising the inpatriate selection process, instead it points out that a proper understanding and acknowledgement by global organizations of elements such as the inpatriate's: (1) assignment characteristics/dynamics (i.e.…”
Section: Recruitmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2002), has argued that traditional IQ tests are too narrow in their focus and that ‘other intelligences’ are required to succeed in the workplace. Harvey et al. (2002) recently proposed eight different kinds of intelligences important for managers which include socio‐cultural, political, innovative and EI.…”
Section: Traditional Intelligencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Riggio, Murphy, and Pirozzolo (2002) believe that the multiple intelligence idea is intuitively appealing because it is selfevident that people require various areas of competence, other than only academic intelligence, to succeed at business leadership. Furnham's (2005) study looks at multiple "business" intelligences, a term used by Harvey, Novicevic, and Kiessling (2002) who listed eight "managerial intelligences." They took as their starting point Sternberg's (1985) triarchic theory of intelligence but split the three intelligences further.…”
Section: Self-perceived Intelligencementioning
confidence: 99%