1968
DOI: 10.1016/s0074-7750(08)60007-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of Lateral and Choice-Sequence Preferences

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1970
1970
1983
1983

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The experimenter remained present throughout all sessions, encouraged the subject to pay attention before each trial, and continuously monitored data to detect any tendency for the subject to develop a preferred response (Gerjuoy & Winters, 1968). In fact, although a problem during initial training, no subject did this during experimental sessions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experimenter remained present throughout all sessions, encouraged the subject to pay attention before each trial, and continuously monitored data to detect any tendency for the subject to develop a preferred response (Gerjuoy & Winters, 1968). In fact, although a problem during initial training, no subject did this during experimental sessions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When people are required to produce binary sequences, they respond not in a random but in a patterned series, although they may be quite unaware of it. On the whole, investigators have found that in children the complexity of the resulting patterns increases with increasing age (Gerjuoy & Winters, 1968).…”
Section: Procedures and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The former include position perseveration (always choosing the stimulus on the left or the stimulus on the right) and position alternation (alternating position, LRLR or RLRL). The latter include consistently choosing red (blue), consistently choosing circle (square), alternating or double alternating colours (forms).From the results of related studies (Gerjuoy & Winters, 1968;Spitz, Carroll & Johnson, 1975) it was assumed that position hypothesis would be high in the retarded subjects' hierarchy of hypotheses and consequently the dimension they would try before testing stimulus dimension hypotheses. It should be noted that the nature of the discrimination problem and the type of stimuli employed will determine, to some extent, the size and nature of the hypothesis that is sampled initially.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the results of related studies (Gerjuoy & Winters, 1968;Spitz, Carroll & Johnson, 1975) it was assumed that position hypothesis would be high in the retarded subjects' hierarchy of hypotheses and consequently the dimension they would try before testing stimulus dimension hypotheses. It should be noted that the nature of the discrimination problem and the type of stimuli employed will determine, to some extent, the size and nature of the hypothesis that is sampled initially.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%