2011
DOI: 10.1107/s090744491101883x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of high-performance X-ray transparent crystallization plates forin situprotein crystal screening and analysis

Abstract: X-ray transparent crystallization plates based upon a novel drop-pinning technology provide a flexible, simple and inexpensive approach to protein crystallization and screening. The plates consist of open cells sealed top and bottom by thin optically, UV and X-ray transparent films. The plates do not need wells or depressions to contain liquids. Instead, protein drops and reservoir solution are held in place by rings with micrometre dimensions that are patterned onto the bottom film. These rings strongly pin t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, COC has seen widespread adoption as the polymer film of choice for X-ray compatible devices, 46 including simple channel structures for counterdiffusion, 56,58,60,61,126 droplet-based devices, 108,109,118 and larger-scale X-ray compatible wellplates. [127][128][129][130][131][132][133][134][135][136][137][138][139][140] However, further decreasing the device thickness to achieve the signal-to-noise levels required for microcrystallography is a significant materials' challenge. Typical reports of X-ray compatible microfluidics describe results where the path length of the device materials is nearly twice that of the crystal of interest.…”
Section: B Device Materials For Microcrystallographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, COC has seen widespread adoption as the polymer film of choice for X-ray compatible devices, 46 including simple channel structures for counterdiffusion, 56,58,60,61,126 droplet-based devices, 108,109,118 and larger-scale X-ray compatible wellplates. [127][128][129][130][131][132][133][134][135][136][137][138][139][140] However, further decreasing the device thickness to achieve the signal-to-noise levels required for microcrystallography is a significant materials' challenge. Typical reports of X-ray compatible microfluidics describe results where the path length of the device materials is nearly twice that of the crystal of interest.…”
Section: B Device Materials For Microcrystallographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most laboratories this harvesting step remains the same delicate, labour-intensive, manual process that it was at the advent of cryocrystallograpy (Garman & Schneider, 1997). One strategy to eliminate the mounting bottleneck has been to avoid the need for transfer entirely, by developing in situ diffraction techniques (Bingel-Erlenmeyer et al, 2011;Michalska et al, 2015;Soliman, Warkentin, Apker, & Thorne, 2011). Other approaches to ex situ screening have tried to design human out of the process, via novel harvesting techniques, or by reproducing the human mounting technique with advanced robotics (Cipriani et al, 2012;Deller & Rupp, 2014;Viola et al, 2011;Viola, Carman, Walsh, Frankel, & Rupp, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, novel approaches are being sought by engineering the sample environment such that diffraction data of crystals can be collected within their growth environment. One such method is termed in situ or plate-screening 23,24 and it is already implemented at a number of macromolecular crystallography beamlines at various synchrotron sources worldwide 25 . However, the use of this method is limited by the geometrical parameters of the crystal plate and the space available around the sample point of the instrument.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%