Proceedings. 1991 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation
DOI: 10.1109/robot.1991.131850
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of flexible microactuator and its applications to robotic mechanisms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
239
0
3

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 333 publications
(242 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
239
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Once pressurized, the actuator will keep its position with little or no additional energy consumption. FEAs can be operated pneumatically 27,28,29,30,10 or hydraulically 31,32 . Given a small number of options for pressurized working fluid generation, and a significant difference between the time constants for the generators and actuators, pressure regulating components such as regulators and valves are necessary.…”
Section: Actuationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once pressurized, the actuator will keep its position with little or no additional energy consumption. FEAs can be operated pneumatically 27,28,29,30,10 or hydraulically 31,32 . Given a small number of options for pressurized working fluid generation, and a significant difference between the time constants for the generators and actuators, pressure regulating components such as regulators and valves are necessary.…”
Section: Actuationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, there has been significant progress in the field of soft robotics, with the development of many soft grippers (5,6), locomotion robots (7,8), and assistive devices (9). Although their inherent compliance, easy fabrication, and ability to achieve complex output motions from simple inputs have made soft robots very popular (10,11), there is growing recognition that the development of methods for efficiently designing actuators for particular functions is essential to the advancement of the field.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[4,5] The first generation of these systems-originally sketched by Suzumori, [6][7][8] and then realized and elaborated by us, [5,[9][10][11][12][13] and by others [4] -use pneumatic actuators, comprising networks of micro-channels; in our systems, differential expansion of these pneumatic networks (PneuNets) by pressurization using air produces motions (especially bending, curling, and variants on them) that are already established as useful in grippers, and interesting for their potential in walkers, tentacles, and a number of other soft, actuated systems. [14] 4 Although the design of the first of these systems has been relatively simple, the motion they produce on actuation can be surprisingly sophisticated: for example, a representative structure-the "finger" or "tentacle" of a gripper-curls non-uniformly, starting from its tip and proceeding to its stem, although the pressure applied in the PneuNet is approximately uniform throughout the system of inflatable channels.…”
Section: Motionmentioning
confidence: 99%