2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2014.08.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of efficient digestion procedures for quantitative determination of cobalt and molybdenum catalyst residues in carbon nanotubes

Abstract: The authors are grateful to the work of Johana Pathenay from Chemistry Universitary Institute of Technology of Villeurbanne for her active participation in the method validation. Also we want to thank Evelyne Sambardier and Gernod Hudin from Anton Paar for their collaboration for MIC tests and for having provided the carbon nanotubes sample free from Co and MoInternational audienceWhatever the method used for the synthesis of carbon nanotubes (CNTs), they always contain residual catalysts in variable amount. M… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(37 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The possible presence of these compounds was checked to avoid misanalysis of toxicity-related results [44]. Quantification of metal residues in mineralized GO powder was performed as described by Ayouni-Derouiche et al [45] using ICP AES, iCAPTM 6300 analyzer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Germany) (Crealins, Lyon, France). 32 PAHs compounds were analysed from GO dispersion in deionized water using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) according to the normalized procedure NF ISO 28,540 (MicroPolluants Technologie S.A., Saint-Julien-lès-Metz, France).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The possible presence of these compounds was checked to avoid misanalysis of toxicity-related results [44]. Quantification of metal residues in mineralized GO powder was performed as described by Ayouni-Derouiche et al [45] using ICP AES, iCAPTM 6300 analyzer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Germany) (Crealins, Lyon, France). 32 PAHs compounds were analysed from GO dispersion in deionized water using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) according to the normalized procedure NF ISO 28,540 (MicroPolluants Technologie S.A., Saint-Julien-lès-Metz, France).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7,8 Even though ''puried'' CNTs are available commercially, it is sometimes challenging to nd trustworthy information regarding the content of metals and/or the lot-to-lot compositional homogeneity. [9][10][11][12] While this may not constitute a critical issue in applications such as mechanical reinforcement of polymers, in other cases such as electrocatalysis, it can lead to erroneous data interpretation. 13 Historically, two of the most reliable routine tools to quantify metal elements in CNTs are optical emission spectroscopy (OES) and mass spectrometry (MS).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, there has been much effort lately in developing metrology and standardization methods for carbon nanostructure analysis in order to implement accurate quality control checks. These are of the utmost relevance for research-grade samples just as for industrially-produced batches [17][18][19][20][21][22][23]. Unfortunately, there is a growing crisis in the field owing to the lack of affordable and sufficiently sensitive and selective analytical methods [9][10][11][12][13][14][15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The key issue in these two techniques is the solid sample pretreatment method as it is necessary to fully dissolve the sample (including any trace impurity) and obtain a transparent homogeneous aqueous solution. The challenge concerning the determination of trace impurities in CNTs and graphene is precisely the sample preparation step for plasma based techniques since these materials are extremely difficult to bring into solution [17][18][19][20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%