2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2014.11.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of Cotton leaf curl virus resistant transgenic cotton using antisense ßC1 gene

Abstract: Cotton leaf curl virus (CLCuV) is a serious pathogen causing leaf curl disease and affecting the cotton production in major growing areas. The transgenic cotton (Gossypium hirsutum cv. Coker 310) plants were developed by using βC1 gene in antisense orientation gene driven by Cauliflower mosaic virus-35S promoter and nos (nopaline synthase) terminator and mediated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens transformation and somatic embryogenesis system. Molecular confirmation of the transformants was carried out by polymera… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, a positive correlation was observed between virus accumulation and disease severity ( Figure 5 and Figure 6 ) in T 0 and T 1 generation plants. These results are comparable to a report by Asad et al [ 10 ] in which siRNA sequences homologous to viral AC1 , AC2 and AC3 coding regions were expressed in transgenic tobacco plants, resulting in ameliorated foliar symptoms, and another involving G. hirsutum “Coker 310” transgenic cotton plants expressing an antisense βC1 , which showed reduced symptom severity [ 13 ]. Using the cotton leaf curl disease severity rating system of Akhtar and Khan 2002 [ 34 ], scores of 4 to 6 were assigned to non-transgenic cotton plants showing severe leaf curling, vein-thickening, enations, and stunting of plants, while transgenic plants were scored as 0 to 1, and developed mild or no symptoms.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Finally, a positive correlation was observed between virus accumulation and disease severity ( Figure 5 and Figure 6 ) in T 0 and T 1 generation plants. These results are comparable to a report by Asad et al [ 10 ] in which siRNA sequences homologous to viral AC1 , AC2 and AC3 coding regions were expressed in transgenic tobacco plants, resulting in ameliorated foliar symptoms, and another involving G. hirsutum “Coker 310” transgenic cotton plants expressing an antisense βC1 , which showed reduced symptom severity [ 13 ]. Using the cotton leaf curl disease severity rating system of Akhtar and Khan 2002 [ 34 ], scores of 4 to 6 were assigned to non-transgenic cotton plants showing severe leaf curling, vein-thickening, enations, and stunting of plants, while transgenic plants were scored as 0 to 1, and developed mild or no symptoms.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Despite the widespread use of transgenic solutions to pest control in cotton—for example, Bt-toxin expression to reduce feeding damage by lepidopteran pests—and the robust evidence showing that pathogen-derived resistance based on gene silencing is effective for combatting diseases caused by plant viruses [ 5 , 6 , 7 ], the commercialization of transgenic technology for virus disease control has been limited [ 3 ]. In particular, RNA-interference (RNAi) [ 8 ], induced by double-stranded (ds) RNA, has been shown highly effective for silencing viral gene expression in plants to achieve disease resistance, including for geminiviruses [ 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 ]. Stable knockdown of viral gene expression has been demonstrated using small interfering RNA (siRNA) technology by targeting viral coding and non-coding regions involved in viral replication and movement, which are crucial for establishing system infection of the host plant [ 8 , 11 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas, the transgenic plants harboring sgRNA multiplex cassette would be symptom free depending upon the level of expression of each sgRNA ( Figure 5E ). Once proof-of-concept established in N. benthamiana plants then whole system could be tested in the local cotton germplasm such as ‘Cocker’, which is not only susceptible to CLCuD but also easy to transform ( Ikram-Ul-Haq, 2004 ; Sohrab et al, 2014 ). The plant transformation will be done by Agrobacterium -mediated transformation and the fully established transgenic plants will be challenged by viruliferous whiteflies either in the cages or directly exposed to the viral inoculum in the field.…”
Section: Proposed Methodology For Designing Multiplex Sgrna To Circummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presence of antisense viral transcripts is suggested to lead to the formation of dsRNAs with the complementary sense transcripts produced by plant viruses upon infection. The dsRNAs, in turn, elicit the RNA silencing machinery and provide substantial resistance against most geminiviruses (Bejarano and Lichtenstein 1994, Yang et al 2004, Haq et al 2010, Amudha et al 2011, Sohrab et al 2016. Thirdly, a hairpin RNA encoding sense and antisense sequences in a single transcript is expressed producing a dsRNA in transgenic plants conferring resistance to the cognate virus upon viral infection (Hu et al 2011, Leibman et al 2011, Aslam et al 2018.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%