2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2022.120508
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of cellulose triacetate asymmetric hollow fiber membranes with highly enhanced compaction resistance for osmotically assisted reverse osmosis operation applicable to brine concentration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A comparison of the performance changes before and after the membrane modification for 50 h of continuous operation is demonstrated in Figure b. The permeance of the membrane TFC-SP has been in a slow decreasing trend, which is mainly due to the continuous contaminant build-up, high pressure compaction, and clogging of membrane pores. , The permeance of membrane TFC-0 decreased from 1.42 L m –2 h –1 bar –1 at the beginning to 1.31 L m –2 h –1 bar –1 after 50 h, which was basically stabilized, mainly because of the heavy build-up on the membrane surface itself. In contrast, modified membranes are susceptible to more severe concentration polarization and membrane contamination due to the high permeance brought about by the unblocked pores. , The permeance of 3.13 L m –2 h –1 bar –1 was maintained after 50 h of testing, which is still more than twice as much as that of the original membrane, and also basically stabilized after 35 h of operation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…A comparison of the performance changes before and after the membrane modification for 50 h of continuous operation is demonstrated in Figure b. The permeance of the membrane TFC-SP has been in a slow decreasing trend, which is mainly due to the continuous contaminant build-up, high pressure compaction, and clogging of membrane pores. , The permeance of membrane TFC-0 decreased from 1.42 L m –2 h –1 bar –1 at the beginning to 1.31 L m –2 h –1 bar –1 after 50 h, which was basically stabilized, mainly because of the heavy build-up on the membrane surface itself. In contrast, modified membranes are susceptible to more severe concentration polarization and membrane contamination due to the high permeance brought about by the unblocked pores. , The permeance of 3.13 L m –2 h –1 bar –1 was maintained after 50 h of testing, which is still more than twice as much as that of the original membrane, and also basically stabilized after 35 h of operation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Then, the resulting membrane is heated for annealing. Finally, the resulting RO membrane is stored in water for further uses [26,[44][45][46][47][48]98].…”
Section: Cellulose Acetate Ro Membranementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A surge of interest in developing polymeric hollow fiber membranes has been witnessed in the past few decades. Examples of polymers reported include polysulfone (PSF) [ 80 , 81 , 82 , 83 ], polyethersulfone (PES) [ 84 , 85 , 86 , 87 ], cellulose acetate [ 88 , 89 , 90 ], polyimide [ 91 , 92 , 93 , 94 ], polyetherimide [ 95 , 96 , 97 , 98 ], polycarbonate (PC) [ 99 , 100 ], polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) [ 83 , 86 , 101 , 102 , 103 , 104 , 105 , 106 , 107 ], and polybenzimidazole (PBI) [ 108 , 109 ]. The fabrication of polymeric hollow fiber membranes follows the common practice mentioned previously, which often includes a post-treatment such as silicon rubber coating to seal the defects on hollow fiber membranes for superior separation performance [ 110 ].…”
Section: Types Of Hollow Fiber and Their Preparation Routementioning
confidence: 99%