2007
DOI: 10.1080/15569540701506756
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of an on-Site Detection Method for Chemical and Biological Warfare Agents

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We previously evaluated the performance of commercially available portable CWA detectors [6,[19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30]. These included the Draeger safety gas detection tubes [24], an arrayed surface acoustic wave detector [25], a gas chromatograph-mass spectrometer [26], and IMS instruments using 241 Am ionization, namely, aspiration-type detectors M90 D-1 [27], M90 D1-C [28], and ChemPro100 [29] (each manufactured by Environics Oy, Mikkeli, Finland), as well as corona discharge ionization, ammonia dopant-type detector LCD 3.2E (Smiths Detection; Pine Brook, NJ, USA) [30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We previously evaluated the performance of commercially available portable CWA detectors [6,[19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30]. These included the Draeger safety gas detection tubes [24], an arrayed surface acoustic wave detector [25], a gas chromatograph-mass spectrometer [26], and IMS instruments using 241 Am ionization, namely, aspiration-type detectors M90 D-1 [27], M90 D1-C [28], and ChemPro100 [29] (each manufactured by Environics Oy, Mikkeli, Finland), as well as corona discharge ionization, ammonia dopant-type detector LCD 3.2E (Smiths Detection; Pine Brook, NJ, USA) [30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PAHs are known to be toxic [1], carcinogenic [2][3][4], as well as mutagenic [5]. Analytical methods that are capable of monitoring and identifying such hazardous compounds are, therefore, highly desirable [6,7]. Ex-situ methods based on solid-phase extraction [8,9] followed by gas chromatography (GC) or liquid chromatography (LC) mass spectrometry (MS) [10][11][12][13][14] are the most widely adopted methods for both quantitative and quantitative analysis of PAHs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several types of on-site equipment for detecting different agents and with varied sensitivity, accuracy, and detection performance are being used by military forces, police mobile teams, coast guards, and fire defense teams [11,12]. We have previously evaluated several commercially available on-site detection systems [13][14][15][16][17][18][19], such as handheld gas detection tubes [20], ion mobility spectrometry (IMS) instruments [21][22][23][24][25][26], and arrayed surface acoustic wave (SAW) sensors [27]. In addition, we have developed new field-deployable detection equipment such as an amperometric sensor for HD detection [28], an atmospheric pressure counter-flow chemical ionization ion trap mass spectrometer (MS) for the detection of a wide range of CWAs [29][30][31], an electron cyclotron resonance ion source MS instrument for the detection of blood agents, choking agents, and blister agents [32,33], and a low temperature plasma ionization MS technology against nonvolatile CWAs [34].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%