1981
DOI: 10.1177/001316448104100413
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of an Objective Instrument to Measure Identity Status in Terms of Occupation Crisis and Commitment

Abstract: Using male/female high school seniors and college students (freshman through seniors), a 40-item, forced-choice, easily scored, group-administered, objective instrument (DISI-O) was developed, corresponding to Marcia's (1964) interview procedure, to assess five levels of occupation identity status in terms of crisis and commitment. Item and factor analyses demonstrated the construct validity of the status scales and discriminant analyses the predictive power. Showing acceptable reliability estimates, the DISI-… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, in terms of status means, the results seem similar to previous works (e.g., Dellas & Jernigan, 1981;Martins & Carvalho, 2013a;Taveira, 1986Taveira, , 2000Taveira & Campos, 1987), the participants tend to occupy the stage of Moratorium identity, which is characterised by young people who are living a period of exploration of the issues of identity while expressing difficulty in making choices. Although the results seem to indicate that most of the participating students occupy the Moratorium identity status, there is slight evidence that some of the students, attending the Hotel Maintenance Operator course are in Achiever identity status and the students in the other two courses, Kitchen and Waiter, are more positioned in Foreclosure and Diffusion statutes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In general, in terms of status means, the results seem similar to previous works (e.g., Dellas & Jernigan, 1981;Martins & Carvalho, 2013a;Taveira, 1986Taveira, , 2000Taveira & Campos, 1987), the participants tend to occupy the stage of Moratorium identity, which is characterised by young people who are living a period of exploration of the issues of identity while expressing difficulty in making choices. Although the results seem to indicate that most of the participating students occupy the Moratorium identity status, there is slight evidence that some of the students, attending the Hotel Maintenance Operator course are in Achiever identity status and the students in the other two courses, Kitchen and Waiter, are more positioned in Foreclosure and Diffusion statutes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…In an initial phase of our methodological plan, and in order to answer our first research question, "Which differences are in the vocational identity status according to the vocational courses attended by the students? ", we used a sociodemographic sheets to establish the ages and courses attended by these young people and the Dellas Identity Status Inventory Occupation scale (DISI-O, Dellas & Jernigan, 1981) to understand how vocational identity of the young participants was being resolved.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, identity can be fluctuating between moratorium and achievement, and this is called the Mama cycle (Stephen, Fraser, & Marcia, ). Occupational identity development is also complex over a short period of time (Dellas & Jernigan, ; Meeus, ). Similar to Super's () recycling process during career decision making, which can occur in any stage of life, occupational identity could also be in the achievement status after moratorium and vice versa.…”
Section: Occupational Identity Statusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Students responded to the CDS, My Vocational Situation (MVS; Holland, Gottfredson, & Power, 1980), and the Career Decision Profile (CDP; Jones, 1989). The Dellas Identity Status Inventory/Occupation (DISI-0; Dellas & Jernigan, 1981) was used to define identity status. On the basis of the study results, the authors concluded that the three measures of career indecision can distinguish among identity status groups.…”
Section: Career Decision Makingmentioning
confidence: 99%