2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpba.2015.02.051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of an LC–MS/MS assay for the quantitative determination of the intracellular 5-fluorouracil nucleotides responsible for the anticancer effect of 5-fluorouracil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
24
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This would be the case if the transporters involved in the cellular uptake or the enzymes involved in the intracellular ribosylation or phosphorylation would become saturated above a certain 5-FU concentration. Remarkably, the FUTP concentrations which we reported in our analytical paper, measured 30 min after an intravenous 5-FU bolus (400 mg m À2 in 30 min) were in the same range as the FUTP concentrations measured after 14 days of capecitabine treatment twice daily (4.7-11 μM vs. 0.64-14 μM) [13]. This indicates that also brief, high 5-FU exposure can rapidly lead to high intracellular FUTP concentrations and the capacities of the cell membrane transporters and intracellular enzymes are probably not the limiting factors.…”
Section: Figuresupporting
confidence: 82%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This would be the case if the transporters involved in the cellular uptake or the enzymes involved in the intracellular ribosylation or phosphorylation would become saturated above a certain 5-FU concentration. Remarkably, the FUTP concentrations which we reported in our analytical paper, measured 30 min after an intravenous 5-FU bolus (400 mg m À2 in 30 min) were in the same range as the FUTP concentrations measured after 14 days of capecitabine treatment twice daily (4.7-11 μM vs. 0.64-14 μM) [13]. This indicates that also brief, high 5-FU exposure can rapidly lead to high intracellular FUTP concentrations and the capacities of the cell membrane transporters and intracellular enzymes are probably not the limiting factors.…”
Section: Figuresupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The LLQs in PBMC lysate were 0.488 nM for FUTP, 1.66 nM for FdUTP and 0.748 nM for FdUMP. Accuracies were between −2.2 and 7.0% deviation for all analytes, and the coefficient of variation values were ≤4.9% .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…the use of radioactive‐labeled nucleotides or lack of sensitivity) (Procházková, Liu, Friess, Aebi, & Thormann, ; Weckbecker, ). To date and to our knowledge only Derissen, Hillebrand, Rosing, Schellens, and Beijnen () have reported the development of an LC‐MS/MS assay that can quantify FdUMP, FUTP and FdUTP intracellularly, in a clinical setting (Derissen et al, ). Quantification of FdUMP, FUTP and FdUTP in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) by cell lysis and subsequent extraction with methanol was described.…”
Section: Intracellular Metabolites—fdump Futp and Fdutpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of their hydrophilicity, triphosphate nucleosides have very poor retention when separated on traditional reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography columns, and thus another chromatographic approach is required. The possibility is using ion-pairing [12, 16, 19-21, 23, 26, 31, 32, 41, 47] or anion exchange chromatography [13,17,18,27,42]. These approaches enhance the retention on RP columns, but they are, however, compromised by the high levels of additives in mobile phases (ammonium salts and alkylamines), which cause significant ion suppression, poor robustness and instability of the ion exchange columns, and also source pollution, which remains a major problem [10,16,60,76].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%