“…However, interlinking these standards requires addressing geometric conversion and semantic interoperability (Atazadeh et al, 2017b;Saeidian et al, 2021). For example, some studies worked on the interoperability between LandInfra and LADM (Kalogianni et al, 2021;Lemmen et al, 2021;Stubkjaer et al, 2018), the integration of IFC and LADM (Oldfield et al, 2017;Ramlakhan et al, 2023), CityGML and LADM (Góźdź et al, 2014;Gürsoy Sürmeneli et al, 2022;Li et al, 2016), CityGML and IFC (Hajji et al, 2021;Rashidan et al, 2021), and LADM, IFC, and CityGML (Mi, 2019;Sun et al, 2019) in the land administration domain. In addition, jurisdictions may be reluctant to use more than one data model to store, manage, and communicate all data components since this would potentially increase the cost and time for buying, establishing, and training data models.…”