2002
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2002.02130.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of an instrument to measure strategic and clinical quality indicators in postoperative pain management

Abstract: The results suggest initial support for the new instrument as a measure of strategic and clinical quality indicators in postoperative pain management, but it must be further refined, tested and evaluated.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(42 reference statements)
1
31
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In reference to the communication and environment subscales, the score should reach 13.5 points, action and trust subscales -18.0 points. 5,12 The intensity of the pain experienced has been evaluated on the basis of independent questions using an 11-point scale, where 0 points meant lack of pain whereas 10 points meant very severe pain. Psychometric values (alfa Cronbach coefficient) for the Polish version of Strategic and Clinical Quality Indicators in Postoperative Pain Management appeared to be satisfying, with the exception of Communication and Environment subscales, where the values were lower (0.70).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In reference to the communication and environment subscales, the score should reach 13.5 points, action and trust subscales -18.0 points. 5,12 The intensity of the pain experienced has been evaluated on the basis of independent questions using an 11-point scale, where 0 points meant lack of pain whereas 10 points meant very severe pain. Psychometric values (alfa Cronbach coefficient) for the Polish version of Strategic and Clinical Quality Indicators in Postoperative Pain Management appeared to be satisfying, with the exception of Communication and Environment subscales, where the values were lower (0.70).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In regards to the subscales, the minimal score (as recommended by the authors of the original version) was not reached as well. 5,12,18,21,22 In the communication subscale the lowest score applied to the statement concerning information about possible methods of pain relief was 2.87 points (range 1-5). The majority of the respondents (54.1%) ranked those aspects negatively giving them 1 or 2 points.…”
Section: Assessment Of the Quality Of Postoperative Pain Management Wmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Bu çalışmanın yürütüldüğü kliniklerde hastaların ağrılarının bir form aracılığı ile değerlendirilmesi kalite göstergeleri açısın-dan önemli bir adımdır. Ancak literatürde ağrının ayrıntılı tanılanması ve ağrı yönetiminde standartlar belirlenmesi de vurgulanmaktadır 12,14,15,29 . Gunningberg ve Idval (2007) 29 ağrı yönetiminde yaptıkları kalite değerlendirmesinde hastaların ve hemşirelerin görüşle-ri ayrı ayrı ele almışlardır.…”
Section: Bulgularunclassified