“…Immunoassay screening methods have been successfully developed as alternatives to the conventional microbiological or chemical methods for detecting pesticides (insecticides and herbicides), drug residues, and undesirable natural products (Azcona-Olivera et al, 1992;Candlish et al, 1988;Degand et al, 1992;Groopman et al, 1984;Hu et al, 1984;Jung et al, 1989;Plhak and Sporns, 1992;Roseman et al, 1992;Shelby and Kelley, 1992;Wong and Ahmed, 1992;Woychik et al, 1984;Xu et al, 1988). In contrast to microbiological assays, immunoassays are highly specific (Stanker et al, 1987;Vanderlaan et al, 1988;Van Emon et al, 1986), and unlike conventional chemical assays, they require minimal sample preparation procedures (Monroe, 1984).…”
Monoclonal antibodies were developed that bind sarafloxacin, a
fluoroquinolone approved by the
Food and Drug Administration for use against Escherichia
coli in poultry. Splenocytes from mice
immunized with a bovine serum albumin−sarafloxacin conjugate were
fused with SP2/0 myeloma
cells, and hybridomas secreting antibodies against sarafloxacin were
selected and cloned. An enzyme-linked immunoassay was developed, and 50% inhibition of control values
ranged from 7.3 to 48.3
ppb using sarafloxacin as the competitor. Tissue samples were
spiked with sarafloxacin, and the
average percent recoveries at 10, 50, and 100 ppb were 132, 78, and
81%, respectively. Monoclonal
antibodies exhibiting high relative affinity for sarafloxacin were also
characterized for their ability
to detect five structurally related quinolones. The specificity
and cross-reactivities of these antibodies
are discussed in relation to three-dimensional, computer-generated
molecular models of the
fluoroquinolones.
Keywords: Sarafloxacin; fluoroquinolone; ELISA; immunoassay
“…Immunoassay screening methods have been successfully developed as alternatives to the conventional microbiological or chemical methods for detecting pesticides (insecticides and herbicides), drug residues, and undesirable natural products (Azcona-Olivera et al, 1992;Candlish et al, 1988;Degand et al, 1992;Groopman et al, 1984;Hu et al, 1984;Jung et al, 1989;Plhak and Sporns, 1992;Roseman et al, 1992;Shelby and Kelley, 1992;Wong and Ahmed, 1992;Woychik et al, 1984;Xu et al, 1988). In contrast to microbiological assays, immunoassays are highly specific (Stanker et al, 1987;Vanderlaan et al, 1988;Van Emon et al, 1986), and unlike conventional chemical assays, they require minimal sample preparation procedures (Monroe, 1984).…”
Monoclonal antibodies were developed that bind sarafloxacin, a
fluoroquinolone approved by the
Food and Drug Administration for use against Escherichia
coli in poultry. Splenocytes from mice
immunized with a bovine serum albumin−sarafloxacin conjugate were
fused with SP2/0 myeloma
cells, and hybridomas secreting antibodies against sarafloxacin were
selected and cloned. An enzyme-linked immunoassay was developed, and 50% inhibition of control values
ranged from 7.3 to 48.3
ppb using sarafloxacin as the competitor. Tissue samples were
spiked with sarafloxacin, and the
average percent recoveries at 10, 50, and 100 ppb were 132, 78, and
81%, respectively. Monoclonal
antibodies exhibiting high relative affinity for sarafloxacin were also
characterized for their ability
to detect five structurally related quinolones. The specificity
and cross-reactivities of these antibodies
are discussed in relation to three-dimensional, computer-generated
molecular models of the
fluoroquinolones.
Keywords: Sarafloxacin; fluoroquinolone; ELISA; immunoassay
“…Assay format appears to have an effect on the ability of an immunoassay to overcome these matrix effects. For analysis of environmental samples, competitive ELISAs that use immobilized antibody and an enzyme conjugate (Rubio et al, 1991;Schneider and Hammock, 1992;Wong and Ahmed, 1992;Lawruk et al, 1993a) perform better than competitive ELISAs that use free antibody in solution and a coating conjugate (Bushway et al, 1988;Feng et al, 1990;Goh et al, 1990). The purpose of this paper is to describe the development of competitive ELISAs for the herbicides fluroxypyr and triclopyr and outline the application of these ELISAs for use in quantitating concentrations of fluroxypyr and triclopyr in water and soil.…”
Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) were developed to quantitate fluroxypyr [[(4-amino-3,5-dichloro-6-fluoro-2-pyridinyl)oxy]acetic acid] and triclopyr [[(3,5,6-trichloro-2-pyridinyl)oxy]acetic acid] in soil and water. The linear working range of the fluroxypyr ELISA was from 0.1 to 10 ng‚mL -1 with a limit of detection (LOD) of 0.1 ng‚mL -1 and an IC 50 value of 1.6 ng‚mL -1 . The linear working range of the triclopyr ELISA was from 0.1 to 5 ng‚mL -1 with a LOD of 0.1 ng‚mL -1 and an IC 50 value of 1.7 ng‚mL -1 . Cross-reactivity to selected pyridine metabolites and agrochemicals was determined. Significant cross-reactivity (within the linear working range of the ELISA) using the fluroxypyr ELISA was found only to the metabolite 4-amino-3,5-dichloro-6-fluoro-2-methoxypyridine. Significant cross-reactivity using the triclopyr ELISA was found only to the auxinic herbicide 2,4,5trichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4,5-T). The ELISAs accurately estimated fluroxypyr and triclopyr in water at concentrations as low as 0.1 ng‚mL -1 . Analysis of two different soil types with different textures (clay loam and sandy clay loam) required cleanup procedures using filtration and solid phase extraction to accurately estimate fluroxypyr and triclopyr concentrations.
“…Immunoassay technology is being demonstrated as a viable alternative for and a complement to traditional analytical methods for monitoring agrochemicals (Brecht et al, 1995;Schwalbe et al, 1984;Thurman et al, 1990;Wong and Ahmed, 1992). Most assays have followed the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) format, in which measurements are made of the color produced from a colorless substrate by the action of an enzyme conjugated to either an antibody or an analyte molecule.…”
A sensitive immunoanalysis system was developed for the quantitation of
imazethapyr, the active
ingredient in PURSUIT herbicide. Imazethapyr
[5-ethyl-2-(4-isopropyl-4-methyl-5-oxo-2-imidazolin-2-yl)nicotinic acid] is one of the imidazolinone class of
herbicides. The assay was based on sequential
competitive binding of imazethapyr and liposomes for a limited number
of antibody binding sites.
A capillary tube (20 cm × 0.53 mm i.d.) with immobilized
antibody was used as the immunoreactor
column. Liposomes that entrap fluorescent molecules as the
detectable label provide instantaneous,
rather than time-dependent, enhancement, common with enzyme
immunoassays. In this study,
liposomes encapsulated carboxyfluorescein dye and were made antigenic
by incorporating in the
bilayer a phospholipid that had the analyte conjugated to its polar
head group. The calibration
curve for imazethapyr in Tris-buffered saline solution had a working
range of 0.1−100 ng/mL. In
the range between 1 and 100 ng/mL, recoveries from fortified tap and
pond water samples ranged
from 93 to 114%. Filtration was the only step needed for sample
cleanup, and an assay could be
performed in <10 min.
Keywords: Imazethapyr; FILIA (flow injection liposome immunoanalysis);
capillary immunocolumn; immunoassay; herbicide; liposomes
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.