1991
DOI: 10.1016/s0097-5990(16)30491-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of an Acute Pain Service Monitoring and Evaluation System

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the introduction of Acute Pain Services (APS), it is argued that there has been an improvement in doctors’ and nurses’ attitudes towards pain management (Pasero & Hubbard 1991, Boegeskov Nielson et al. 1994, McLeod et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the introduction of Acute Pain Services (APS), it is argued that there has been an improvement in doctors’ and nurses’ attitudes towards pain management (Pasero & Hubbard 1991, Boegeskov Nielson et al. 1994, McLeod et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within the Veterans Health Administration (VHA), the importance of measuring pain treatment effectiveness has been noted in the VHA's National Pain Initiative [2]. Pain treatment specialists have long recognized the need for a uniform method of measuring pain treatment outcomes [3][4][5][6][7]. The development and use of such a system would allow improved evaluation of short-and long-term pain treatment effectiveness, better estimates of the cost effectiveness of interventions, direct comparisons of the outcomes of treatment programs or methods, and improved consumer satisfaction monitoring.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These guidelines have in turn led to educational campaigns and clinical interventions, including multidisciplinary approaches, designed to implement these standards. [9][10][11][12][13][14] While various methods have been proposed to assess quality of pain management, the AH-CPR has stated "the mainstay of pain assessment should be the patient self-report." 8 Because "pain is whatever the experiencing person says it is, existing whenever he says it does," 15 it stands to reason that the management of such a phenomenon should be evaluated by the patient.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%