2020
DOI: 10.1007/s13762-020-02808-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of activated carbon fibers for removal of organic contaminants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among the most efficient techniques, adsorption stands out due to its ease of operation, simplicity of the project and, above all, to be economically viable (Achour et al, 2021;Bulca et al, 2021;Yusop et al, 2021;Paredes-Quevedo et al, 2021;Verma et al, 2019;Machrouhi et al, 2018), being, therefore, widely used to remove certain classes of contaminants from industrial effluents (Achour et al, 2021;Bulca et al, 2021;Yusop et al, 2021;Heidarinejad et al, 2020;Ugwu & Agunwamba, 2020;Alam et al, 2020;Machrouhi et al, 2018). Studies in the literature have reported several efficient materials in the removal of aqueous contaminants such as activated carbon, zeolites, clays, biomass, fungi and bacteria (Achour et al, 2021;Heidarinejad et al, 2020;Ani et al, 2020;Alkathiri et al, 2020;Machrouhi et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Among the most efficient techniques, adsorption stands out due to its ease of operation, simplicity of the project and, above all, to be economically viable (Achour et al, 2021;Bulca et al, 2021;Yusop et al, 2021;Paredes-Quevedo et al, 2021;Verma et al, 2019;Machrouhi et al, 2018), being, therefore, widely used to remove certain classes of contaminants from industrial effluents (Achour et al, 2021;Bulca et al, 2021;Yusop et al, 2021;Heidarinejad et al, 2020;Ugwu & Agunwamba, 2020;Alam et al, 2020;Machrouhi et al, 2018). Studies in the literature have reported several efficient materials in the removal of aqueous contaminants such as activated carbon, zeolites, clays, biomass, fungi and bacteria (Achour et al, 2021;Heidarinejad et al, 2020;Ani et al, 2020;Alkathiri et al, 2020;Machrouhi et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, due to the high costs of commercial activated carbon, alternative adsorbents that guarantee the same adsorption efficiency have been studied, with emphasis on those produced from residues from agricultural and extractive activities (Achour et al, 2021;Alam et al, 2020;Alkathiri et al, 2020;Panwar and Pawar, 2020;Kannaujiya et al, 2021;Zoroufchi Benis et al, 2020;Reza et al, 2020). Several studies report the use of these materials in the synthesis of activated carbon for remediation of effluents, such as the study by Njoku et al (2014) who studied the efficiency of activated carbon obtained from rambutan husk (Nephelium lappaceum) in the adsorption of acid yellow dye 17 (Reza et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a similar process, high-rank anthracites can be activated to yield ACs with surface areas of 1900–2800 m 2 g −1 [ 52 , 63 ]. The ACs produced from commercial carbon fibers are highly microporous solids but have SSA values below 2000 m 2 g −1 [ 54 , 64 ]. Well-ordered multi-wall carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) can be transformed to mesoporous powders with surface areas of 1200–1700 m 2 g −1 via KOH activation [ 65 , 66 ].…”
Section: Activation Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent decades the application of carbonaceous adsorbents in environmental remediation has received great attention due to their high specific surface area, tunable pore size distribution and surface functionalities, leading to high removal efficiencies against both organic and inorganic pollutants [6][7][8]. These characteristics are achieved using activation and modification to achieve the desired properties to attract target pollutants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%