Development of a Web-Based Tool for Risk Assessment and Exposure Control Planning of Silica-Producing Tasks in the Construction Sector

Abstract

We describe the development and implementation of a novel, on-line risk assessment tool for respirable crystalline silica (RCS) exposure for use in the construction sector. It was motivated by the introduction of new OHS regulation in British Columbia that allowed for the substitution of exposure measurement data with “objective air monitoring data” collected at “equivalent work operations.” This allowance encouraged the introduction of quantitative risk assessment in a notoriously challenging work environment but it was concluded that without assistance, the typical construction employer would struggle to identify, extract, and interpret validate objective data. The tool described here was based on a continually-updatable RCS exposure database, and a predictive regression model based on the database to generate exposure risk estimates. The model was embedded in an adaptive web-based application that can be run on common platforms. The design followed standard web conventions and features so that no specialized training is required for its use. It was designed to be usable by end-users with varying expertise, including non-OHS experts. Users describe the RCS-dust generating task they will perform, and associated control measures. The tool estimates both uncontrolled and controlled task-based exposure concentrations. Using additional information entered by the user, the on-line tool generates an “exposure control plan” or ECP, a legally regulated document for those undertaking work potentially exposing workers to RCS particulate. The development of the tool was a community-based, tri-partite effort of the local OHS regulator, construction employers, and exposure scientists. In addition to being a practical risk assessment tool, the designers wanted it to function as an educational tool, and that it should explore novel methods for exposure data collection and use. The strengths of this approach include the publicly shared updateable database that encourages continuous improvement and illustrates best practices; and the timely and cost effective collection and sharing of exposure data in a value-added manner. It is however limited to a single task per ECP, and only considers exposure to task operators, and not adjacent workers. Currently in BC, users generate up to 3,900 ECP's per year with the tool.

Occupational Risk Factors by Sectors: An Observational Study of 20,000 Workers

“…These include handling hazardous materials such as adhesives, solvents, and cleaning agents, as well as exposure to fumes, gases, dust, and fibers from building materials such as asbestos, etc. For instance, a construction worker may be involved in mixing and applying chemicals to treat concrete surfaces, or in sanding and cutting materials that generate fumes and dust [ 36 ]. Data have shown that workers in both the construction and manufacturing sectors were primarily exposed to chemicals or cosmetics, as well as fumes, gases, and dust.…”

A Strategy for Field Evaluations of Exposures and Respiratory Health of Workers at Small- to Medium-Sized Coffee Facilities

“…Some factors may be constant within a facility and gathered anytime during the exposure survey (such as general exhaust ventilation parameter), while others may vary in time requiring collection during air sampling (such as tasks, tools, amount of time in different locations) ( 41 ). Whereas, attempts to standardize the collection and storage of contextual information have not gained traction ( 15 , 18 , 21 , 22 , 25 , 26 , 41 , 42 ), numerous studies have successfully collected and used contextual information specific to their research to better understand the causes of variation or to predict exposures ( 41 – 43 ).…”

Assessing the Mediating Role of Safety Communication Between Safety Culture and Employees Safety Performance

“…Personnel in the field have to deal with the instability of the drilling and production process. Activities such as overbalanced wells, gas leakages, and generally, the reactive nature of hydrocarbon resources tend to create life-threatening situations if not monitored well ( 22 ). That is why much of the literature has focused on the health safety environment (HSE) in the petrochemical, oil and gas sector.…”