2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0920-3796(02)00253-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a water detritiation facility for JET

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, significant improvement in sensitivity is required if this technique is to become competitive with MS or laser based optical techniques, or to be applied to systems where concentrations are much lower. In the case of fusion reactor applications, the concentration of tritium in water arising from the exhaust detritiation systems ranges from 25− 250 ppb 37 and other applications such as effluent from fission reactors and contaminated water from Fukushima are many orders of magnitude below this. 38 In order to improve the sensitivity, it would be desirable to find another absorbance peak responsive to deuterium which is both better resolved and larger than the HDO scissoring peak.…”
Section: ■ Signal Amplificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, significant improvement in sensitivity is required if this technique is to become competitive with MS or laser based optical techniques, or to be applied to systems where concentrations are much lower. In the case of fusion reactor applications, the concentration of tritium in water arising from the exhaust detritiation systems ranges from 25− 250 ppb 37 and other applications such as effluent from fission reactors and contaminated water from Fukushima are many orders of magnitude below this. 38 In order to improve the sensitivity, it would be desirable to find another absorbance peak responsive to deuterium which is both better resolved and larger than the HDO scissoring peak.…”
Section: ■ Signal Amplificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tritium extraction from water is a difficult task with significant impact on plant size and cost (R&D topic 8). In ITER, tritium removal from water is performed in the water detritiation system (WDS) by means of the CECE process (combination of electrolysis and catalytic exchange) [24] which reduces the total amount of tritiated water via tritium enrichment at the electrolyser and at the same time achieves decontamination factors of several orders of magnitude along the liquid phase catalytic exchange column [34]. At this stage, the CECE process (having reached a score of 65%) appears the best choice also for the DEMO water coolant purification system even if main drawbacks (like investment cost for platinum catalyst, operating cost for the electrolysers, and explosion risk with electrolysis) have to be overcome in view of a larger scale plant.…”
Section: Technology Review and Gap Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Well-proven processes for the treatment of tritiated water use water distillation and water/gas catalytic exchange that, in turn, could be combined with electrolysis [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10]. Although these processes are characterised by large energy consumption (heat and/or electricity), they rely on well-developed technology and have been applied worldwide in several plants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%