Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2020
DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.9b05635
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Highly Sensitive Real-Time Isotopic Quantification of Water by ATR-FTIR

Abstract: A method has been developed to reliably quantify the isotopic composition of liquid water, requiring only immersion of a “ReactIR” probe in the sample under test. The accuracy and robustness of this method has been extensively tested using a deuterium/protium system, and substantial improvements in sensitivity were obtained using highly novel chemical signal amplification methods demonstrating a standard deviation of 247 ppb D (a δD of 1.6 ‰). This compares favorably with other more costly and time-consuming t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(54 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, we evaluated local baseline subtraction, as it is often used as a standard data-processing step in FTIR-based quantification [ 7 , 14 ]. We compared the AUC values for both CH and C=O regions, with and without local baseline subtraction, calculated using the trapezoid area formula detailed in Methods Section 2.8 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Finally, we evaluated local baseline subtraction, as it is often used as a standard data-processing step in FTIR-based quantification [ 7 , 14 ]. We compared the AUC values for both CH and C=O regions, with and without local baseline subtraction, calculated using the trapezoid area formula detailed in Methods Section 2.8 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our evaluation of lipid quantification by FTIR highlights a detrimental impact of baseline subtraction on the CH region AUC, which we determined to be more accurate than the alternative C=O peak. Baseline subtraction is also referred to as baseline correction, or anchoring, and can be a default parameter in FTIR spectral processing software [ 7 , 14 ]. While useful in some applications, quantification of peaks in complex mixtures with overlapping spectra faces augmentation of the local baseline absorbance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To avoid overlap with a strong IR absorption peak (1635 cm -1 ) [22] of water used as a solvent, deuterium oxide (D 2 O) is employed as the continuous phase. The absorption peak corresponding to the scissors-bending mode of D-O-D shifts to a lower wavenumber (1200 cm -1 ) [23] and does not overlap with the characteristic signal. Figure 1E shows the brightfield and the heat map images of uncrosslinked and crosslinked AESO droplets (0.4 wt.% photoinitiator, 2 min UV exposure).…”
Section: Principle and Polymerization Of The Aeso Dropletsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Finally, we evaluated local baseline subtraction as it is often used as a standard data processing step in FTIR-based quantification [16,17]. Surprisingly, quantification in both the CH and C=O regions was less effective when baseline subtraction was employed, resulting in significantly different AUC values between TBME and other extractions (Figure 1D).…”
Section: Impact Of Lipid Sample Purity On Atr-ftir Spectra -Compariso...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our evaluation of lipid quantification by FTIR highlights a detrimental impact of baseline subtraction on the CH region AUC, which we determined to be more accurate than the alternative C=O peak. Baseline subtraction is also referred to as baseline correction, or anchoring, and can be a default parameter in FTIR spectral processing software [16,17]. While useful in some applications, quantification of peaks in complex mixtures with overlapping spectra faces augmentation of the local baseline absorbance.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%