2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-1759(01)00448-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a time-resolved immunofluorometric assay for quantitation of mucosal and systemic antibody responses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It also shows that the positive responses are extreme values of the corresponding age-specific distributions. The markedly stronger IgG fluorescence values are mainly due to the stronger fluorescence of Europium, which was used with anti-IgG detection antibodies, than of Samarium, which was used with anti-IgA antibodies [30].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It also shows that the positive responses are extreme values of the corresponding age-specific distributions. The markedly stronger IgG fluorescence values are mainly due to the stronger fluorescence of Europium, which was used with anti-IgG detection antibodies, than of Samarium, which was used with anti-IgA antibodies [30].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Direct and indirect competitive TR-FIAs were compared in the measurement of methamphetamine in urine (Kimura et al 1999), showing that the indirect competitive format, using biotinylated antigen, was 100 Á/ 1000 times more sensitive than the direct, using Eu-labelled antigen. Hale et al (2001) compared direct with indirect TR-FIA in the measurement of serum immunoglobulins: Biotinylated antibody with Eu-streptavidin was found to be 100 times more sensitive than the same antibody conjugated to samarium and in sandwich TR-FIAs to determine human FSH and TSH (Suonpaa et al 1992), indirect TR-FIA using Eu-streptavidin was shown to be 2 Á/5 times more sensitive than direct TR-FIA. Hale et al (2001) also compared direct TR-FIA with ELISA, in the measurement of serum IgG and IgA, using the same antibodies conjugated to Eu, Sm or alkaline phosphatase (AP).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hale et al (2001) compared direct with indirect TR-FIA in the measurement of serum immunoglobulins: Biotinylated antibody with Eu-streptavidin was found to be 100 times more sensitive than the same antibody conjugated to samarium and in sandwich TR-FIAs to determine human FSH and TSH (Suonpaa et al 1992), indirect TR-FIA using Eu-streptavidin was shown to be 2 Á/5 times more sensitive than direct TR-FIA. Hale et al (2001) also compared direct TR-FIA with ELISA, in the measurement of serum IgG and IgA, using the same antibodies conjugated to Eu, Sm or alkaline phosphatase (AP). The TR-FIAs were found to be respectively 10 and 37 times more sensitive than the corresponding ELISAs, but no comparison was made with HRPconjugated antibody.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[18][19][20] Of particular concern to its applications is the study of coordination compounds in solution 21,22 and luminescent assays for biochemistry. 23, 24 After many experiments, the Eu-(II)-dipicolinate complex was employed to investigate the energy transfer mechanism for the HCO 4 -system. As shown in Figure 3, it was found that, by injecting Eu(III) (50 µL) into HCO 4 -solution, no CL emission was observed with our apparatus.…”
Section: On-line Preparation Of Hcomentioning
confidence: 99%