Development of a Surgical Simulator for Training Retraction of Tissue with an Encountered-Type Haptic Interface Using MR Fluid

Tsujita, Teppei; Sasc, Kazuya; Chen, Xiaoshuai; Tomita, Masashige; Konno, Atsushi; Nakayama, M.; Nakagawa, Atsuhiro; Abe, K.; Uchiyama, Masaru

doi:10.1109/robio.2018.8665269

Cited by 5 publications

(14 citation statements)

References 12 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Tsujita 2018 [42] Development of a surgical simulator for training retraction of tissue with an encountered-type haptic interface using MR fluid.…”

Section: Parkes 2009 [39]mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…With regard to question GQ1 ("Which is the target clinical area? "), 22 of the 23 studies concern simulators for training of surgical tasks/procedures (such as neurosurgery [22,42], abdominal surgery [24,26,40,44], orthopedic surgery [23,27,29,41,43], dental surgery [28,35,38], otorhinolaryngological surgery [31], laparoscopic basic tasks [25,33,36], abdominal surgery and basic tasks [37], palpation [39], intravenous injection [34], and central venous catheter insertion [30]); eight of them use the simulation also as an assessment tool [25,33,34,37,40,41,43]. One study reports the use of simulation only for didactive purposes to learn anatomy [32].…”

Section: Target Clinical Area (Gq1 Fq1)mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…(non inv., minimally inv., inv. )"), a total of 15 studies concern the simulation of MIS procedures [24][25][26][27][29][30][31]33,34,36,37,40,41,43,44], six concern the simulation of invasive approaches [22,23,28,35,38,42], and only one concerns the simulation of a non-invasive approach [39].…”

Section: Surgical Approaches (Fq1)mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…(technical skills, non-technical skills)"), in the largest part of the analyzed studies [22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31]33,34,37,38,40,41,44], the simulators address both the technical and non-technical skills. Only in five studies [35,36,39,42,43] do the simulators address only the technical skills. Indeed, many studies show that simulation-based education is a powerful tool to teach both technical and non-technical skills to individual surgeons and surgical teams without risking patient safety.…”

Section: Technical and Non-technical Skills In Surgery (Gq2)mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…With regard to question GQ3 ("Does the simulator integrate haptic feedback? "), 22 [22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44] of the 23 studies integrate haptic feedback. The only system that does not offer such feedback is the simulator presented in [32] designed for the AR visualization of anatomical models for educational purposes.…”

Section: Haptic Feedback (Gq3 Fq2)mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Augmented Reality, Mixed Reality, and Hybrid Approach in Healthcare Simulation: A Systematic Review

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Simulation-based medical training is considered an effective tool to acquire/refine technical skills, mitigating the ethical issues of Halsted’s model. This review aims at evaluating the literature on medical simulation techniques based on augmented reality (AR), mixed reality (MR), and hybrid approaches. The research identified 23 articles that meet the inclusion criteria: 43% combine two approaches (MR and hybrid), 22% combine all three, 26% employ only the hybrid approach, and 9% apply only the MR approach. Among the studies reviewed, 22% use commercial simulators, whereas 78% describe custom-made simulators. Each simulator is classified according to its target clinical application: training of surgical tasks (e.g., specific tasks for training in neurosurgery, abdominal surgery, orthopedic surgery, dental surgery, otorhinolaryngological surgery, or also generic tasks such as palpation) and education in medicine (e.g., anatomy learning). Additionally, the review assesses the complexity, reusability, and realism of the physical replicas, as well as the portability of the simulators. Finally, we describe whether and how the simulators have been validated. The review highlights that most of the studies do not have a significant sample size and that they include only a feasibility assessment and preliminary validation; thus, further research is needed to validate existing simulators and to verify whether improvements in performance on a simulated scenario translate into improved performance on real patients.

show abstract

“…Tsujita 2018 [42] Development of a surgical simulator for training retraction of tissue with an encountered-type haptic interface using MR fluid.…”

Section: Parkes 2009 [39]mentioning

confidence: 99%