2017
DOI: 10.1111/cdoe.12358
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a simplified dysphagia assessment by dentists in older persons

Abstract: Simplified clinical examination of swallowing by dentists was found to be an accurate method to screen dysphagia in older persons.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Den SAT is a simplified accurate assessment tool used by dentists to identify elders with dysphagia. Therefore, dentists are key members in identifying signs and symptoms of deglutition problems and referring patients to speech therapists or swallowing therapist for further assessment and treatment [36]. Table 1 Characteristics of original articles that are related to oral health and oropharyngeal dysphagia (OD).…”
Section: Roles Of Dentists Dental Hygienists and Dental Nurses In Dymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Den SAT is a simplified accurate assessment tool used by dentists to identify elders with dysphagia. Therefore, dentists are key members in identifying signs and symptoms of deglutition problems and referring patients to speech therapists or swallowing therapist for further assessment and treatment [36]. Table 1 Characteristics of original articles that are related to oral health and oropharyngeal dysphagia (OD).…”
Section: Roles Of Dentists Dental Hygienists and Dental Nurses In Dymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Four studies were cross-sectional [ 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 ] and three studies were cohort [ 64 , 65 , 66 ]. The oldest study was published in 1996 [ 64 ] and the most recent study in 2018 [ 59 , 62 , 63 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, 38 studies were excluded for not reporting assessment method for dysphagia ( n = 20), the study subject was the facility rather than participants ( n = 3), studies not conducted in nursing homes ( n = 7), study participants from the same sample ( n = 2), and the study was an intervention or pilot study ( n = 6). In the end, 43 studies 8,9,12–52 met the inclusion criteria and were included in the meta‐analysis. No study was identified through hand searching the reference lists of included articles.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%