2019
DOI: 10.1111/age.12785
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a simple SLA‐1 copy‐number‐variation typing and the comparison of typing accuracy between real‐time quantitative and droplet digital PCR

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Typing PAMs were performed using genomic DNA isolated using NucleoSpin Blood kit (Macherey-Nagel, Düren, Germany), and SLA-1 , SLA-2 and SLA-3 classical SLA I genes. Typing was performed following previously established protocols [ 35 , 36 , 37 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typing PAMs were performed using genomic DNA isolated using NucleoSpin Blood kit (Macherey-Nagel, Düren, Germany), and SLA-1 , SLA-2 and SLA-3 classical SLA I genes. Typing was performed following previously established protocols [ 35 , 36 , 37 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%