2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.radmeas.2012.11.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a scintillating fiber-optic dosimeter for measuring the entrance surface dose in diagnostic radiology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other authors declare an energy dependence of plastic scintillator detectors sensitivity in the radiologic energy range (25-150 kVp). 13,14,[16][17][18][19] As reported by Williamson et al, 16 Lessard et al, 18 and Peralta and Rêgo, 19 it is partly related to energy absorption differences between the reference dose medium and the scintillator medium (air and polystyrene respectively in our case). As shown in Figure 4, the polystyrene-toair mass energy-absorption coefficients ratio shows significant variations ,100 keV.…”
Section: Full Paper: Scintillating Fibre Detector For Small Animal Dosupporting
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Other authors declare an energy dependence of plastic scintillator detectors sensitivity in the radiologic energy range (25-150 kVp). 13,14,[16][17][18][19] As reported by Williamson et al, 16 Lessard et al, 18 and Peralta and Rêgo, 19 it is partly related to energy absorption differences between the reference dose medium and the scintillator medium (air and polystyrene respectively in our case). As shown in Figure 4, the polystyrene-toair mass energy-absorption coefficients ratio shows significant variations ,100 keV.…”
Section: Full Paper: Scintillating Fibre Detector For Small Animal Dosupporting
confidence: 68%
“…The different prototypes described in literature present dosemeters with linear, reproducible dose measurements. [13][14][15] However, other studies also found an energy dependence of the dosemeter response, expressed as a decrease of sensitivity with decreasing energy. [16][17][18][19] In addition, in the kilovoltage energy range, the stem effect is mainly due to the fluorescence of the optical fibre and its contribution has been reported to be small.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Several studies evaluate the characteristics of optical fiber based dosimeters for radiology measurements. [17][18][19][20][21] Theses dosimeters have a very small volume (~1 mm 3 ) and excellent tissue equivalence in terms of electron density and atomic composition. The main disadvantage is the noise signal produced in the light-guide by Cerenkov radiation for higher MeV and fluorescence for low energy X-ray beam.…”
Section: Optical Fiber Dosimetermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, apprehension about possible harm to people caused by radiation exposure has risen as the clinical use of diagnostic procedures increases. The radiological technologists have been demanding dose information [ 2 , 3 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The entrance surface dose (ESD reported in mGy) value is specified as a useful descriptor to evaluate the absorbed dose of the patient in diagnostic radiology and it is generally defined as the absorbed dose detected at the point of intersection of the central X-ray beam axis with the patient or phantom surface, including backscattered radiation [ 2 , 3 ]. In practice, however, the absorbed dose is delivered unevenly in a beam irradiation field because the intensity distribution in an X-ray beam is not uniform due to the influence of the heel effect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%