2021
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245164
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a reverse transcription recombinase polymerase amplification assay for rapid and direct visual detection of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)

Abstract: Rapid diagnosis is an important intervention in managing the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) outbreak. Real time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) remains the primary means for diagnosing the new virus strain but it is time consuming and costly. Recombinase polymerase amplification (RPA) is an isothermal amplification assay that does not require a PCR machine. It is an affordable, rapid, and simple assay. In this study, we developed and optimized a sensitive… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(17 reference statements)
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One more isothermal amplification method is based on recombinase polymerase amplification (RPA), which involves two primers that bind a double-stranded template using single-stranded binding proteins and recombinase, followed by extension with DNA polymerase [40]. Recently, reverse transcription RPA (RT-RPA) based assay for SARS-CoV-2 detection was reported characterized by test time less than 20 min and LOD 5 copies/µL [41]. Consider also one of the most recent molecular SARS-CoV-2 detection methods, which is based on the Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR)-based approach.…”
Section: Molecular Methods For the Detection Of Sars-cov-2 Virusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One more isothermal amplification method is based on recombinase polymerase amplification (RPA), which involves two primers that bind a double-stranded template using single-stranded binding proteins and recombinase, followed by extension with DNA polymerase [40]. Recently, reverse transcription RPA (RT-RPA) based assay for SARS-CoV-2 detection was reported characterized by test time less than 20 min and LOD 5 copies/µL [41]. Consider also one of the most recent molecular SARS-CoV-2 detection methods, which is based on the Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR)-based approach.…”
Section: Molecular Methods For the Detection Of Sars-cov-2 Virusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advantages of RPA include: (1) it is the fastest nucleic acid amplification technique, requiring only 15 min for completion; (2) it requires moderate heating to only 37–42 °C, which makes the equipment's temperature control module much simpler and cost effective. A suggestion of references using RPA detection include: (1) the use of exonuclease probes with internally linked quencher (Exo-IQ) to rapidly detect SARS-CoV-2 through low-volume real-time single-tube reverse transcription recombinase polymerase amplification ( Behrmann et al, 2020 ); (2) rapid and direct visual detection of SARS-CoV-2 by a reverse transcription recombinase polymerase amplification assay ( Lau et al, 2021 ); (3) single-copy sensitive, field-deployable, and simultaneous dual-gene detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA by modified RT-RPA ( Xia and Chen, 2020 ).…”
Section: Molecular Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For SARS-CoV-2, RT-RPA has also been widely reported to detect genetic targets of the virus such as the N gene ( Table 5 ) and the LOD of the assay could be 5 RNA copies in 1 μL of a sample with a sensitivity of 98% [119] or 7.8 RNA molecules per reaction with 100 sensitivity as compared to qRT-PCR [120] . Besides, the assay specificity could be as high as 100% [119] , [120] .…”
Section: Different Diagnostic Approaches To Detect Mers-cov and Sars-cov-2 Infectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For SARS-CoV-2, RT-RPA has also been widely reported to detect genetic targets of the virus such as the N gene ( Table 5 ) and the LOD of the assay could be 5 RNA copies in 1 μL of a sample with a sensitivity of 98% [119] or 7.8 RNA molecules per reaction with 100 sensitivity as compared to qRT-PCR [120] . Besides, the assay specificity could be as high as 100% [119] , [120] . On the other hand, when other molecular targets like RdRp and ORF 1ab were used in RT-RPA to detect the presence of SARS-CoV-2, the assay sensitivity was lower [121] , [122] and the LOD of the assay could be 10-folds less sensitive than qRT-PCR [122] .…”
Section: Different Diagnostic Approaches To Detect Mers-cov and Sars-cov-2 Infectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%