2012 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference Record (NSS/MIC) 2012
DOI: 10.1109/nssmic.2012.6551324
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a range counter with SiPM readout for proton CT

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The size of each single finger prototype was 200 × 10 × 5 mm 3 . First principle considerations and available literature data prompted us to start with 5 mm thick plastic scintillator planes, as thinner planes would not significantly increase the energy resolution, given the intrinsic proton range straggling of about 3-4 mm in our energy range [27].…”
Section: A Design Of the Impact Calorimetermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The size of each single finger prototype was 200 × 10 × 5 mm 3 . First principle considerations and available literature data prompted us to start with 5 mm thick plastic scintillator planes, as thinner planes would not significantly increase the energy resolution, given the intrinsic proton range straggling of about 3-4 mm in our energy range [27].…”
Section: A Design Of the Impact Calorimetermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hodoscopic CsI calorimeter of the existing scanner [31] is both too slow and in need of tedious calibrations to ensure the needed uniformity [38]. A range counter with 4 mm scintillator plates with direct MCPP readout showed good SNR, with signals 3–5 times that of 3 mm plates and WLSF readout [39]. The baseline is a novel multi-stage scintillator (MSS) counter, consisting of three 10 × 10 × 40 cm 3 polystyrene blocks with light guides and 3″ photomultiplier (PM) readout [40].…”
Section: Instrumentation For Hadronsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Measured WEPL resolution for different degrader thickness for the WEPL detector choices: the existing CsI calorimeter [31], a range counter with 4 mm plates [39], one MSS block measured “head-on” labeled “calorimeter” [40], and a 3-stage MSS [40]. …”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%