Development of a Photographic Scale for Consistency and Guidance in Dermatologic Assessment of Forearm Sun Damage

McKenzie, Naja E.; Saboda, Kathylynn; Duckett, Laura; Goldman, Rayna; Hu, Chengcheng; Curiel‐Lewandrowski, Clara

doi:10.1001/archdermatol.2010.392

Cited by 29 publications

(41 citation statements)

References 18 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…M89 was applied twice daily by the subjects on cleansed and dried facial skin for 4 weeks. Dermatologists clinical scores (10‐point scale, ranking each clinical sign as follows: None (0), Low (1‐3), Moderate (4‐6), Severe (7‐9) revealed that compared to baseline, at 28 days assessment, complexion radiance, complexion homogeneity, plumpness, and smoothness of the treated facial skin had notably improved. Subjects’ scores revealed similar improvements as scored by the dermatologists.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

A review of protection against exposome factors impacting facial skin barrier function with 89% mineralizing thermal water

Salsberg¹,

Andriessen²,

Abdulla³

et al. 2019

J of Cosmetic Dermatology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background The skin exposome refers to the constellation of external exposures that contribute to cutaneous aging, including solar radiation, air pollution, tobacco smoke, unbalanced nutrition, and cosmetic products. This review explores the skin exposome and the role of a combination hyaluronic acid and mineralized thermal water product used to restore and maintain optimal skin barrier function. Method An expert panel of 7 dermatologists who treat clinical signs of facial aging convened for a one‐day meeting to discuss the results of a literature review on the skin exposome and the role of M89, a mineralized thermal water and hyaluronic acid‐based gel, to improve the quality of facial skin. Evidence coupled with expert opinion and experience of the panel was used to address clinical challenges in the treatment of photo‐aging, and the use of M89. Results Solar radiation (ultraviolet radiation, visible light, and infrared radiation), air pollution, tobacco smoke, nutrition, and miscellaneous factors, including stress, sleep deprivation, and temperature, may potentiate skin aging by triggering molecular processes that damage skin structure. M89 was developed to maintain and restore skin and contains ingredients to aid physical, hydric, antioxidant, and antimicrobial skin barrier function. Conclusions Increasing knowledge of the exposome and microenvironment contributing to skin aging may support a better understanding of measures to support the skin. The initial results of in vitro and clinical studies of M89 show its potential to improve skin barrier function.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

A review of protection against exposome factors impacting facial skin barrier function with 89% mineralizing thermal water

Salsberg¹,

Andriessen²,

Abdulla³

et al. 2019

J of Cosmetic Dermatology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The three subjects chosen for this pilot study expressed various levels of photodamage, including clinically-apparent AKs for one subject ( Fig. 1) characterized by digital photograph [19]. Three wide-field images of both arms were taken from the knuckle (metacarpal-phalangeal) to the elbow to cover the forearm.…”

Section: Sample Selections and Clinical Assessmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

Noninvasive mesoscopic imaging of actinic skin damage using spatial frequency domain imaging

Travers

Poon

Rohrbach

et al. 2017

Biomed. Opt. Express

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

For prevention and accurate intervention planning, it is crucial to predict if lesions will progress towards cancer. In this study, we investigated the change in optical properties and vascular parameters to characterize skin tissue from mild photodamage to actinic keratosis (AK). Multi-wavelength spatial frequency domain imaging (SFDI) measurements were performed on three patients with clinically normal skin, as well as pre-cancerous actinic keratosis lesions. Our results indicate that there exist significant differences in both optical and vascular parameters between these patients, and that these parameters can be early biomarkers of neoplasia. Ultimately, clinicians can use this noninvasive approach for frequent monitoring of high-risk population.

show abstract

“…Recent review of the literature indicates that no single clinical assessment can accurately quantify the degree of photodamage in skin . Although photonumeric scales exist for facial and forearm photoaging, hypo‐collagenesis has never been correlated with any clinical feature. It will be interesting to collect precise clinical data such as degree/amount of rhytides, sallowness, mottled pigmentation, lentigines, and telangiectasia to establish which clinical feature is best associated with hypo‐collagenesis.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Hypo‐collagenesis in photoaged skin predicts response to anti‐aging cosmeceuticals

Sachs

Rittié

Chubb

et al. 2013

J of Cosmetic Dermatology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Development of a Photographic Scale for Consistency and Guidance in Dermatologic Assessment of Forearm Sun Damage

Cited by 29 publications

References 18 publications

A review of protection against exposome factors impacting facial skin barrier function with 89% mineralizing thermal water

A review of protection against exposome factors impacting facial skin barrier function with 89% mineralizing thermal water

Noninvasive mesoscopic imaging of actinic skin damage using spatial frequency domain imaging

Hypo‐collagenesis in photoaged skin predicts response to anti‐aging cosmeceuticals

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About